什么是最好的选择 AMD EPYC 9654 或 Baikal-S? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
AMD EPYC 9654 has a base frequency of 2.40 GHz. 96 / 192 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 360 W. 发布于 Q4/2022.
Baikal-S has a base frequency of 2.2 GHz. 48 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 9% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
48 more cores
共同立场 AMD EPYC 9654 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Baikal-S 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD EPYC 9654
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Baikal-S 和 AMD EPYC 9654. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD EPYC 9654 和 Baikal-S Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD EPYC 9654 和 Baikal-S, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9654 | 53461.641272 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 96 threads / windows System RAM: 160 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-N Duration: 18.705 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD EPYC 9654 和 Baikal-S.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.