What's the best choice AMD EPYC 9654 or Baikal-S? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
AMD EPYC 9654 has a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. 96 / 192 Cores. Power consumption of 360 W. Released in Q4/2022.
Baikal-S has a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz. 48 Cores. Power consumption of 120 W. Released in Q1/2022.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
Higher clock speed
Around 8% better clock speed
2.2 GHz
More number of cores
48 times more cores
48
Common positions AMD EPYC 9654 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Performance per watt
About 0.33 times less performance per watt
360 W
Common positions Baikal-S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
AMD EPYC 9654
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Baikal
Baikal-S
Server
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
2.2 GHz
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Baikal-S and AMD EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
DDR43-3200
768
6
Yes
4
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD EPYC 9654 and Baikal-S to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
120 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD EPYC 9654 and AMD EPYC 9654, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
16 nm
FCLGA-3467
512 KB
2 MB
CortexA75
Q1/2022
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD EPYC 9654 and Baikal-S.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
