Family illustration.
What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D or Intel Core i5-14600K? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D has a base frequency of 4.7 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. Released in 2024-11-07.
Intel Core i5-14600K has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2023.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 34% better clock speed
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
6 more cores
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 2 % higher specified turbo frequency
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Intel Core i5-14600K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Intel Core i5-14600K, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Intel Core i5-14600K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 387.601609 samples/min Submissions: 35 | 338.678074 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -12.6 % |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 366.580728 samples/min Submissions: 169 | 317.243316 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -13.5 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 395.565005 samples/min Submissions: 25 | 338.239757 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -14.5 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 370.912589 samples/min Submissions: 163 | 311.979665 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -15.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 367.535688 samples/min Submissions: 48 | 322.758515 samples/min Submissions: 17 | -12.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 391.167316 samples/min Submissions: 95 | 300.096793 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -23.3 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 333.029807 samples/min Submissions: 989 | 299.897209 samples/min Submissions: 93 | -9.9 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 320.502075 samples/min Submissions: 444 | 301.862874 samples/min Submissions: 47 | -5.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 320.757236 samples/min Submissions: 596 | 297.597714 samples/min Submissions: 32 | -7.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 323.517057 samples/min Submissions: 160 | 293.011509 samples/min Submissions: 48 | -9.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 333.805259 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 315.487077 samples/min Submissions: 40 | -5.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-14600K | Cinebench 2024 / multi-core | 1392 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core i5-14600K | Cinebench 2024 / single-core | 122 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 3647 points | |
| Intel Core i5-14600K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 3640 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 328 points | |
| Intel Core i5-14600K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 297 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core i5-14600K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 9371 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 9057 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 818 points | |
| Intel Core i5-14600K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 790 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| Intel Core i5-14600K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 24491 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 23230 points | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2080 points | |
| Intel Core i5-14600K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2064 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 11922.930179 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / B650E MAX GAMING WIFI Duration: 83.872 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-14600K | 6351.182273 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 20 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING X AX Duration: 157.451 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |