Was ist die beste Wahl? AMD Ryzen 5 7500F oder AMD Ryzen 9 7900X? Welcher Prozessor ist schneller?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Freigegeben in 2023-07-22.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has a base frequency of 4.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. Freigegeben in 2022-09-27.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 27% höhere taktfrequenz
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
6 more cores
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 12 % higher specified turbo frequency
Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Hintergrundinformationen zu den verglichenen Prozessoren, Serien, Generationen und Marktsegmenten.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Interne Grafik beeinträchtigt nicht die Leistung der CPU, sondern übernimmt die Arbeit der Grafikkarte bei deren Abwesenheit oder auf mobilen Geräten.
Integrierte Codecs für die Kodierung und Dekodierung von Inhalten. Erhebliche Beschleunigung der erforderlichen Vorgänge.
Typen, Kanalmenge des RAM, unterstützt von AMD Ryzen 9 7900X und AMD Ryzen 5 7500F. Je nach Motherboard können höhere oder niedrigere Speicherfrequenzen unterstützt werden.
Vergleichen Sie die TDP-Anforderungen von TDP AMD Ryzen 5 7500F und AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektur, Schnittstellen, zusätzliche Anweisungen, die von AMD Ryzen 5 7500F und AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, Technologien für virtuelle Maschinen und Verfahrenstechnik.
Shared tests with results for both models: 12
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 202.875257 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 444.104583 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +118.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 211.016448 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 402.994833 samples/min Submissions: 143 | +91.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 226.467652 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 481.361918 samples/min Submissions: 34 | +112.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 193.086364 samples/min Submissions: 85 | 406.708812 samples/min Submissions: 127 | +110.6 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.747448 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 390.634852 samples/min Submissions: 206 | +103.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 241.602998 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 482.755636 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +99.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 188.964731 samples/min Submissions: 55 | 391.064336 samples/min Submissions: 145 | +107.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 238.274443 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 493.686905 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +107.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.434044 samples/min Submissions: 85 | 396.197227 samples/min Submissions: 309 | +107.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 250.362812 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 510.14922 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +103.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 208.496404 samples/min Submissions: 66 | 400.971593 samples/min Submissions: 148 | +92.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 198.856133 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 412.755161 samples/min Submissions: 318 | +107.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 4856 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 324 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 11563 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 786 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 29480 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2039 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | 9236.168837 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 108.27 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 16626.209557 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Duration: 60.146 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |