Jaki jest najlepszy wybór AMD Ryzen 5 7500F lub AMD Ryzen 9 7900X? Który procesor jest szybszy?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Wydany w 2023-07-22.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has a base frequency of 4.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. Wydany w 2022-09-27.
Powody do rozważenia Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 27% lepsza prędkość zegara
Większa liczba rdzeni
6 more cores
Wyższa prędkość zegara turbo
Wokół 12 % higher specified turbo frequency
Wspólne stanowiska AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Informacje ogólne o porównywanych procesorach, serii, generacji i segmencie rynku.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics nie wpływa na wydajność procesora, wykonuje pracę karty graficznej w przypadku jej braku lub na urządzeniach mobilnych.
Wbudowane kodeki wykorzystywane do kodowania i dekodowania treści. Znacznie przyspiesza wymagane operacje.
Typy, kanały ilość pamięci RAM obsługiwanych przez AMD Ryzen 9 7900X oraz AMD Ryzen 5 7500F. W zależności od płyt głównych mogą być obsługiwane wyższe lub niższe częstotliwości pamięci.
Porównaj wymagania TDP AMD Ryzen 5 7500F oraz AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektura, interfejsy, dodatkowe instrukcje obsługiwane przez AMD Ryzen 5 7500F oraz AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, technologie maszyn wirtualnych i technologie procesowe.
Shared tests with results for both models: 12
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 202.875257 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 444.104583 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +118.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 211.016448 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 402.994833 samples/min Submissions: 143 | +91.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 226.467652 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 481.361918 samples/min Submissions: 34 | +112.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 193.086364 samples/min Submissions: 85 | 406.708812 samples/min Submissions: 127 | +110.6 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.747448 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 390.634852 samples/min Submissions: 206 | +103.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 241.602998 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 482.755636 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +99.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 188.964731 samples/min Submissions: 55 | 391.064336 samples/min Submissions: 145 | +107.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 238.274443 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 493.686905 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +107.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.434044 samples/min Submissions: 85 | 396.197227 samples/min Submissions: 309 | +107.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 250.362812 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 510.14922 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +103.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 208.496404 samples/min Submissions: 66 | 400.971593 samples/min Submissions: 148 | +92.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 198.856133 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 412.755161 samples/min Submissions: 318 | +107.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 4856 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 324 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 11563 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 786 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 29480 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2039 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | 9236.168837 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 108.27 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 16626.209557 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Duration: 60.146 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |