Qual è la scelta migliore AMD Ryzen 5 7500F o AMD Ryzen 9 7900X? Quale processore è più veloce?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Rilasciato in 2023-07-22.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has a base frequency of 4.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. Rilasciato in 2022-09-27.
Motivi da considerare Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
Velocità di clock più alta
Intorno a 27% migliore velocità di clock
Più numero di core
6 more cores
Velocità di clock turbo più alta
Intorno a 12 % higher specified turbo frequency
Posizioni comuni AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da AMD Ryzen 9 7900X e AMD Ryzen 5 7500F. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP AMD Ryzen 5 7500F e AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da AMD Ryzen 5 7500F e AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
Shared tests with results for both models: 12
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 202.875257 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 444.104583 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +118.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 211.016448 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 402.994833 samples/min Submissions: 143 | +91.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 226.467652 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 481.361918 samples/min Submissions: 34 | +112.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 193.086364 samples/min Submissions: 85 | 406.708812 samples/min Submissions: 127 | +110.6 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.747448 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 390.634852 samples/min Submissions: 206 | +103.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 241.602998 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 482.755636 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +99.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 188.964731 samples/min Submissions: 55 | 391.064336 samples/min Submissions: 145 | +107.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 238.274443 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 493.686905 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +107.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.434044 samples/min Submissions: 85 | 396.197227 samples/min Submissions: 309 | +107.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 250.362812 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 510.14922 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +103.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 208.496404 samples/min Submissions: 66 | 400.971593 samples/min Submissions: 148 | +92.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 198.856133 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 412.755161 samples/min Submissions: 318 | +107.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 4856 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 324 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 11563 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 786 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 29480 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2039 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | 9236.168837 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 108.27 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 16626.209557 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Duration: 60.146 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |