Qual é a melhor escolha AMD Ryzen 5 7500F ou AMD Ryzen 9 7900X? Qual é o processador mais rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Lançado em 2023-07-22.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has a base frequency of 4.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. Lançado em 2022-09-27.
Razões a considerar Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
Maior velocidade do relógio
Por volta de 27% melhor velocidade do relógio
Mais número de núcleos
6 more cores
Maior velocidade do relógio turbo
Por volta de 12 % higher specified turbo frequency
Posições comuns AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Informação de base sobre os processadores a serem comparados, séries, geração e segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
A placa gráfica interna não afecta o desempenho da CPU, realiza o trabalho da placa gráfica na sua ausência ou em dispositivos móveis.
Codecs incorporados utilizados para codificar e descodificar o conteúdo. Acelera significativamente as operações necessárias.
Tipos, quantidade de canais de RAM suportados por AMD Ryzen 9 7900X e AMD Ryzen 5 7500F. Dependendo das placas-mãe, podem ser suportadas frequências de memória mais altas ou mais baixas.
Comparar os requisitos de TDP do TDP AMD Ryzen 5 7500F e AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instruções adicionais suportadas por AMD Ryzen 5 7500F e AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, tecnologias de máquinas virtuais e tecnologia de processos.
Shared tests with results for both models: 12
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 202.875257 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 444.104583 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +118.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 211.016448 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 402.994833 samples/min Submissions: 143 | +91.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 226.467652 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 481.361918 samples/min Submissions: 34 | +112.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 193.086364 samples/min Submissions: 85 | 406.708812 samples/min Submissions: 127 | +110.6 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.747448 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 390.634852 samples/min Submissions: 206 | +103.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 241.602998 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 482.755636 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +99.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 188.964731 samples/min Submissions: 55 | 391.064336 samples/min Submissions: 145 | +107.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 238.274443 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 493.686905 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +107.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 191.434044 samples/min Submissions: 85 | 396.197227 samples/min Submissions: 309 | +107.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 250.362812 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 510.14922 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +103.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 208.496404 samples/min Submissions: 66 | 400.971593 samples/min Submissions: 148 | +92.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 198.856133 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 412.755161 samples/min Submissions: 318 | +107.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 4856 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 324 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 11563 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 786 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 29480 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2039 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | 9236.168837 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 108.27 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 16626.209557 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Duration: 60.146 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |