What's the best choice Apple M2 or Apple M1? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Apple M2 has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. Released in Q1/2022.
Apple M1 has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. Released in Q4/2020.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 9% better clock speed
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Common positions Apple M1 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Apple M2
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 and Apple M2. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Apple M2 and Apple M1 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Apple M2 and Apple M1, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Shared tests with results for both models: 10
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Apple M2 | Apple M1 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / macOS | 100.173049 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 96.078989 samples/min Submissions: 22 | -4.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / macOS | 104.380321 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 90.420336 samples/min Submissions: 39 | -13.4 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / macOS | 102.840324 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 89.566831 samples/min Submissions: 23 | -12.9 % |
| Blender 5.0.0 / CPU / macOS | 103.199504 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 92.935054 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -9.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / macOS | 111.263779 samples/min Submissions: 63 | 95.360964 samples/min Submissions: 105 | -14.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / macOS | 107.178387 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 94.12081 samples/min Submissions: 78 | -12.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / macOS | 107.226936 samples/min Submissions: 55 | 92.32679 samples/min Submissions: 107 | -13.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / macOS | 105.547344 samples/min Submissions: 110 | 92.720814 samples/min Submissions: 116 | -12.2 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / macOS | 107.210301 samples/min Submissions: 47 | 94.689726 samples/min Submissions: 61 | -11.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / macOS | 108.981218 samples/min Submissions: 124 | 95.708251 samples/min Submissions: 143 | -12.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.