Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Samsung Exynos 2200
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) vs Samsung Exynos 2200. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2022
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Released
Q1/2022
User rating
star star star star star
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Exynos 2200

What's the best choice Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) or Samsung Exynos 2200? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 20 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 60 W. Released in Q1/2022.

Samsung Exynos 2200 has a base frequency of 2.80 GHz. 8 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q1/2022.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    15 left arrow place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 14% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • More number of cores

    12 more cores

    20 left arrow 8

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    81 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    36 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    66 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    13 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    3 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    20 place

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 2200 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    257 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    491 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    202 place

Specifications

Technical data
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Apple M1 left arrow Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Family
    Apple M series left arrow Samsung Exynos
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 6
  • Predecessor
    - left arrow Samsung Exynos 2100
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    16x Firestorm left arrow 1x Cortex-X2
  • A-Core Frequency
    3.2 GHz left arrow 2.8 GHz
  • B-Core
    4x Icestorm left arrow 3x Cortex-A710
  • B-Core Frequency
    2.06 GHz left arrow 2.52 GHz
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    20 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    20 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • C-Core
    - left arrow 4x Cortex-A510
  • C-Core Frequency
    - left arrow 1.82 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    - left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    1024 left arrow 24
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 1
  • GPU Frequency
    1300 MHz left arrow 1300 MHz
  • GPU name
    Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) left arrow Samsung Xclipse 920 (RDNA 2)
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow 1300 MHz
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 0
  • Max. GPU Memory
    64 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2022
  • Shader
    8192 left arrow 384
  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • H.264 / AVC
    Conflicting source values: Decode | Decode / Encode left arrow Conflicting source values: Decode / Encode | No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU). Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB left arrow 12 GB
  • Memory Bandwidth
    819.2 GB/s left arrow 51.2 GB/s
  • Memory channels
    8 (Octa Channel) left arrow 4
  • Memory type
    LPDDR5-6400 left arrow LPDDR5-6400
  • PCIe
    4.0 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) and Samsung Exynos 2200 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    60 W left arrow -
  • TDP up
    120 W left arrow -
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) and Samsung Exynos 2200, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    M1 left arrow Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510
  • Chip design
    Chiplet left arrow -
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv9-A64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    52 MB left arrow -
  • Operating systems
    macOS left arrow Android
  • Part Number
    - left arrow SM-S908B
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2022
  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Virtualization
    Apple Virtualization Framework left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) and Samsung Exynos 2200.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

1793.000000
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
1186.000000
Samsung Exynos 2200
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

24055.000000
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
3586.000000
Samsung Exynos 2200
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

21200.000000
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
1422.000000
Samsung Exynos 2200

Latest comparisons