Was ist die beste Wahl? AMD EPYC 9754 oder AMD EPYC 9684X? Welcher Prozessor ist schneller?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD EPYC 9754 has a base frequency of 2.25 GHz. 128 / 256 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 360 W. Freigegeben in Q2/2023.
AMD EPYC 9684X has a base frequency of 2.55 GHz. 96 / 192 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 400 W. Freigegeben in Q2/2023.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Größere Anzahl von Kernen
32 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 13% höhere taktfrequenz
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 19 % higher specified turbo frequency
AMD EPYC 9754
Hintergrundinformationen zu den verglichenen Prozessoren, Serien, Generationen und Marktsegmenten.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Interne Grafik beeinträchtigt nicht die Leistung der CPU, sondern übernimmt die Arbeit der Grafikkarte bei deren Abwesenheit oder auf mobilen Geräten.
Integrierte Codecs für die Kodierung und Dekodierung von Inhalten. Erhebliche Beschleunigung der erforderlichen Vorgänge.
Typen, Kanalmenge des RAM, unterstützt von AMD EPYC 9684X und AMD EPYC 9754. Je nach Motherboard können höhere oder niedrigere Speicherfrequenzen unterstützt werden.
Vergleichen Sie die TDP-Anforderungen von TDP AMD EPYC 9754 und AMD EPYC 9684X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektur, Schnittstellen, zusätzliche Anweisungen, die von AMD EPYC 9754 und AMD EPYC 9684X, Technologien für virtuelle Maschinen und Verfahrenstechnik.
Shared tests with results for both models: 1
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD EPYC 9754 | AMD EPYC 9684X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 3082.993526 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 3572.444303 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +15.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9684X | 49790.878311 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 96 threads / linux System RAM: 256 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-NT Duration: 20.084 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | 67230.506515 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 10M / 128 threads / windows System RAM: 192 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-N/NT Duration: 148.742 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |