Cuál es la mejor opción AMD EPYC 9754 o AMD EPYC 9684X? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD EPYC 9754 has a base frequency of 2.25 GHz. 128 / 256 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 360 W. Publicado en Q2/2023.
AMD EPYC 9684X has a base frequency of 2.55 GHz. 96 / 192 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 400 W. Publicado en Q2/2023.
Razones a tener en cuenta Más número de núcleos
32 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Razones a tener en cuenta Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 13% mejor velocidad de reloj
Mayor velocidad de reloj turbo
En 19 % higher specified turbo frequency
AMD EPYC 9754
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por AMD EPYC 9684X y AMD EPYC 9754. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
Compara los requisitos del TDP AMD EPYC 9754 y AMD EPYC 9684X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por AMD EPYC 9754 y AMD EPYC 9684X, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
Shared tests with results for both models: 1
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD EPYC 9754 | AMD EPYC 9684X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 3082.993526 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 3572.444303 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +15.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9684X | 49790.878311 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 96 threads / linux System RAM: 256 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-NT Duration: 20.084 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | 67230.506515 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 10M / 128 threads / windows System RAM: 192 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-N/NT Duration: 148.742 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |