Qual è la scelta migliore AMD EPYC 9754 o AMD EPYC 9684X? Quale processore è più veloce?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD EPYC 9754 has a base frequency of 2.25 GHz. 128 / 256 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 360 W. Rilasciato in Q2/2023.
AMD EPYC 9684X has a base frequency of 2.55 GHz. 96 / 192 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 400 W. Rilasciato in Q2/2023.
Motivi da considerare Più numero di core
32 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Motivi da considerare Velocità di clock più alta
Intorno a 13% migliore velocità di clock
Velocità di clock turbo più alta
Intorno a 19 % higher specified turbo frequency
AMD EPYC 9754
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da AMD EPYC 9684X e AMD EPYC 9754. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP AMD EPYC 9754 e AMD EPYC 9684X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da AMD EPYC 9754 e AMD EPYC 9684X, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
Shared tests with results for both models: 1
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD EPYC 9754 | AMD EPYC 9684X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 3082.993526 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 3572.444303 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +15.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9684X | 49790.878311 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 96 threads / linux System RAM: 256 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-NT Duration: 20.084 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | 67230.506515 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 10M / 128 threads / windows System RAM: 192 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-N/NT Duration: 148.742 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |