Quel est le meilleur choix ? AMD EPYC 9754 ou AMD EPYC 9684X? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD EPYC 9754 has a base frequency of 2.25 GHz. 128 / 256 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 360 W. Sorti en Q2/2023.
AMD EPYC 9684X has a base frequency of 2.55 GHz. 96 / 192 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 400 W. Sorti en Q2/2023.
Raisons de considérer Plus grand nombre de cœurs
32 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Raisons de considérer Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée
Autour de 13% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge
Vitesse d'horloge turbo plus élevée
Autour de 19 % higher specified turbo frequency
AMD EPYC 9754
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par AMD EPYC 9684X et AMD EPYC 9754. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Comparez les exigences du TDP AMD EPYC 9754 et AMD EPYC 9684X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par AMD EPYC 9754 et AMD EPYC 9684X, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
Shared tests with results for both models: 1
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD EPYC 9754 | AMD EPYC 9684X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 3082.993526 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 3572.444303 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +15.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9684X | 49790.878311 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 96 threads / linux System RAM: 256 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-NT Duration: 20.084 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | 67230.506515 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 10M / 128 threads / windows System RAM: 192 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-N/NT Duration: 148.742 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |