Select processor 1
Select processor 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Matrox LUMA A310F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs Matrox LUMA A310F. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Released
Q2/2023
Overall score
star star star star star
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F

What's the best choice NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 or Matrox LUMA A310F? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has a maximum frequency of 2.235 GHz. Memory size 24 GB. Memory type GDDR6X. Released in Q4/2022.

Matrox LUMA A310F has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 11% better clock speed

    2.235 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • More memory

    83% more memory

    24 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310F
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place

Specifications

Technical data
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 left arrow Intel Arc A310 Graphics
  • GPU Chip
    AD102-300 / AD102-301 (Ada Lovelace) left arrow ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    128 left arrow 96
  • Shader
    16384 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    192 left arrow 16
  • Texture Units
    512 left arrow 32
  • Raytracing Cores
    128 left arrow 6
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    24 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6X left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.313 GHz left arrow 1.938 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    21.0 Gbps left arrow 15.5 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    1008 GB/s left arrow 124 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    384 bit left arrow 64 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.235 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.520 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    450 W left arrow 50 W-33 %
  • TDP (up)
    450 W-25 % left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    90 °C left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow --
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Radial
  • Fan 1
    2 x 110 mm left arrow 1 x 70 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    39 dB left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 4x DP v2.1
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    304 mm left arrow 168 mm
  • Height
    137 mm left arrow 69 mm
  • Width
    61 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 1 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Matrox LUMA A310F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 8
  • Release date
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q2/2023
  • Launch Price
    1,599 $ (Reference) left arrow --
  • Structure size
    4 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow LUMA-A310F
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
82.58
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F
-->

Latest comparisons