What's the best choice NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 or Matrox LUMA A310F? Which graphics card is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has a base frequency of 2.23 GHz. Memory size 24 GB. Memory type GDDR6X. Released in Q4/2022.
Matrox LUMA A310F has a base frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 12% better clock speed
2.000 GHz
More memory
500% more memory
4 GB
Common positions NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F, chip, information processing units.
-
Intel Arc A310 Graphics
-
ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
16
6
768
96
32
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
124 GB/s
64 bit
1938 MHz
15.5 Gbps
4 GB
GDDR6
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
2000 MHz
2000 MHz
-
Yes
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
-
-
-
50 W-33 %
-
-
Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F.
Air cooling
Radial
1 x 70 mm
-
0 dB / Silent
-
Connectivity and connections.
4 × DisplayPort 2.1
-
2.3
-
4
-
PCIe 4.0 x8
-
-
-
Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.
12_2 (Ultimate)
No
No LED lighting
7680 × 4320
Yes
Built-in support for video and image compression standards.
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
No
Decode / Encode
The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices
69 mm
168 mm
1 PCIe-Slots
-
-
Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Matrox LUMA A310F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
data sheet
-
-
LUMA-A310F
6 nm
Q2/2023
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | 31793 points | System: GeForce RTX 4090 Graphics: GeForce RTX 4090 Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310F.
Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Game frame rates
Archived results. The original measurement method and test conditions have not been verified.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
