Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Matrox LUMA A310F vs ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F
Released
Q4/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310F or ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310F has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC has a maximum frequency of 2.200 GHz+ 7 %. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q4/2022.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310F
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 9% better clock speed

    2.200 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1215 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow Intel Arc A750 Graphics
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 448
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 3584
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 112
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 224
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 28
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 256 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz+ 7 %
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    50 W-33 % left arrow 225 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC.

  • Fan-Type
    Radial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 2x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 2x DP v2.0
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 271 mm
  • Height
    69 mm left arrow 132 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 48 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 785 g
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC and Matrox LUMA A310F.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310F left arrow A750 CLD 8GO
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310F
43 fps (avg)
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F
15.76
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
-->

Latest comparisons