AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Prozessor 2 auswählen
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen
User rating
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q1/2025
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Abbildung der Produktfamilie.

Prozessor AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Spezifikationen und Benchmarks

Auf dem Übersichtsprozessor AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, dessen Freigabe am Q1 2025 erfolgte. Hier sind alle technischen Eigenschaften und Leistungsbewertungen von AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 in Benchmarks. Wir empfehlen, alle Daten zu prüfen und mit dem Wettbewerbsmodell zu vergleichen. Die Basistaktfrequenz des Modells ist 3 GHz, alle Kerne sind 16 / 32. Der Prozessor unterstützt 256-bit LPDDR5x und ist auf dem Motherboard auf FP11 installiert. Die geschätzte TDP für CPU beträgt 55 W.

Specifications

Technische Daten
Prozessorgeneration und -serie
  • Serie
    Ryzen
  • Form Factor
    Laptops / Desktops
  • Name
    AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
  • Segment
    Mobile
  • Series
    Ryzen AI Max 300 Series
CPU Kerne und Basisfrequenz
  • Base Frequency
    3 GHz
  • CPU Kerne
    16
  • CPU Threads
    32
  • Max. Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz
Interne Grafiken
  • GPU Frequency
    2900 MHz
  • GPU-Name
    Radeon 8060S Graphics
  • Graphics Cores
    40
Speicher & PCIe
  • Speicher Typ
    256-bit LPDDR5x
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0
Energieverbrauch
  • Configurable TDP
    45-120 W
  • Default TDP
    55 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C
Technische Einzelheiten
  • Availability window (manufacturer)
    Q1 2025
  • Codename
    Strix Halo
  • Date evidence scope
    Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source.
  • L2-Cache
    16 MB
  • L3-Cache
    64 MB
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q1/2025
  • Steckdose
    FP11
  • technisches verfahren
    TSMC 4nm FinFET
Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

No data

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPU

Published results: 4

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settingsAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 447.642125 samples/min Submissions: 12
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 445.528248 samples/min Submissions: 12
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 548.440615 samples/min Submissions: 5
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 284.491844 samples/min Submissions: 17

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
7582 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
464 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1710 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1860 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
116 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
115 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1813 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
114 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
44735 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 1280x720
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
35314 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
2027 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
13988 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
796 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
30087 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 1920x1080
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Time Spy Graphics / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
11164 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 2560x1440
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
10286 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution:
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
10636 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution:
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Comparable benchmark results are required to suggest performance alternatives.

*

PL1 is the sustained processor power limit; PL2 is the short-term turbo power limit. They are not measured performance or efficiency.

Die Werte werden zur Auswahl des optimalen Kühlsystems und der Stromversorgung verwendet.

Bewerten Sie den Prozessor
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Letzte Vergleiche