Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H gegen AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

User rating
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q4/2023
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Abbildung der Produktfamilie.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Freigegeben
—
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

Abbildung der Produktfamilie.

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

Was ist die beste Wahl? Intel Core Ultra 5 125H oder AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS? Welcher Prozessor ist schneller?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has a base frequency of 1.2 GHz. 14 / 18 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 28 W. Freigegeben in Q4/2023.

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS has a base frequency of 3.2 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W.

Unterschiede

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Einen Fehler melden
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    10 more cores

    14 left arrow 4
  • Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

    Rund um 7% higher specified turbo frequency

    4.5 GHz left arrow 4.2 GHz
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    28 W left arrow 45 W
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 167% höhere taktfrequenz

    3.2 GHz left arrow 1.2 GHz

Specifications

Technische Daten
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Hintergrundinformationen zu den verglichenen Prozessoren, Serien, Generationen und Marktsegmenten.

  • Serie
    Intel Core Ultra Series 1 left arrow Ryzen
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Form Factor
    - left arrow Laptops / Desktops
  • Series
    - left arrow Ryzen 7000 Series
Technische Daten der CPU

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • CPU Kerne
    14 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    18 left arrow 8
  • E-core Base Clock
    0.7 GHz left arrow -
  • Efficient Cores
    8 left arrow -
  • Low Power Efficient-cores
    2 left arrow -
  • Max. Boost Clock
    4.5 GHz left arrow 4.2 GHz
  • P-core Base Clock
    1.2 GHz left arrow -
  • Performance Cores
    4 left arrow -
  • Base Frequency
    - left arrow 3.2 GHz
  • Übertaktung
    - left arrow Nein
IGPU

Interne Grafik beeinträchtigt nicht die Leistung der CPU, sondern übernimmt die Arbeit der Grafikkarte bei deren Abwesenheit oder auf mobilen Geräten.

  • GPU-Name
    Intel Arc graphics left arrow None
  • GPU Turbo
    2200 MHz left arrow -
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Typen, Kanalmenge des RAM, unterstützt von AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS und Intel Core Ultra 5 125H. Je nach Motherboard können höhere oder niedrigere Speicherfrequenzen unterstützt werden.

  • Max. Speicher
    96 GB left arrow -
  • Speicherkanäle
    2 left arrow 2
  • Speicher Typ
    Up to LPDDR5/X 7467 MT/s left arrow DDR5
  • PCIe
    - left arrow PCIe 4.0
Energieverbrauch

Vergleichen Sie die TDP-Anforderungen von TDP Intel Core Ultra 5 125H und AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Turbo Power
    115 W left arrow -
  • Minimum Assured Power
    20 W left arrow -
  • TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)
    28 W left arrow -
  • Configurable TDP
    - left arrow 35-53 W
  • Default TDP
    - left arrow 45 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    - left arrow 95 °C
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Architektur, Schnittstellen, zusätzliche Anweisungen, die von Intel Core Ultra 5 125H und AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS, Technologien für virtuelle Maschinen und Verfahrenstechnik.

  • L3-Cache
    18 MB left arrow 8 MB
  • Official specification sheet
    https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf left arrow -
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q4/2023 left arrow -
  • Steckdose
    FCBGA2049 left arrow FP7r2
  • Codename
    - left arrow Rembrandt R
  • L2-Cache
    - left arrow 2 MB
  • technisches verfahren
    - left arrow TSMC 6nm FinFET

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 1

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settingsIntel Core Ultra 5 125H AMD Ryzen 5 7235HSResult difference¹
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 118.248036 samples/min Submissions: 8 78.461488 samples/min Submissions: 18 -33.6 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 1584 points System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra
CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W
Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz
RAM: 16 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 364 points System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra
CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W
Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz
RAM: 16 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 394 points System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra
CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W
Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz
RAM: 16 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 89 points System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra
CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W
Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz
RAM: 16 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 12 threads / linux

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 3189.080588 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 12 threads / linux
System RAM: 24 GB
OS: Linux x86_64
Duration: 313.57 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 8419 points System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra
CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W
Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz
RAM: 16 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 1539 points System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra
CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W
Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz
RAM: 16 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 3203 points System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra
CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W
Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz
RAM: 16 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 592 points System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra
CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W
Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz
RAM: 16 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Letzte Vergleiche