Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

报告一个错误

更多的核心数量

10 more cores

14 4
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 7% higher specified turbo frequency

4.5 GHz 4.2 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

28 W 45 W

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

报告一个错误

更高的时钟速度

左右 167% 更好的时钟速度

3.2 GHz 1.2 GHz

规格

技术数据

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

系列

Intel Core Ultra Series 1 Ryzen
分段

Mobile Mobile
Form Factor

- Laptops / Desktops
Series

- Ryzen 7000 Series

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

CPU核数

14 4
CPU线程

18 8
E-core Base Clock

0.7 GHz -
Efficient Cores

8 -
Low Power Efficient-cores

2 -
Max. Boost Clock

4.5 GHz 4.2 GHz
P-core Base Clock

1.2 GHz -
Performance Cores

4 -
Base Frequency

- 3.2 GHz
超频

- 没有

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

GPU名称

Intel Arc graphics None
GPU Turbo

2200 MHz -

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS 和 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

最大内存

96 GB -
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

Up to LPDDR5/X 7467 MT/s DDR5
PCIe

- PCIe 4.0

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 和 AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Turbo Power

115 W -
Minimum Assured Power

20 W -
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

28 W -
Configurable TDP

- 35-53 W
Default TDP

- 45 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

- 95 °C

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 和 AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

L2-Cache

18 MB 8 MB
Official specification sheet

https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf -
发布日期

Q4/2023 -
插座

FCBGA2049 FP7r2
Codename

- Rembrandt R
L2-Cache

- 2 MB
技术过程

- TSMC 6nm FinFET

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 1

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS	Result difference¹
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows	118.248036 samples/min Submissions: 8	78.461488 samples/min Submissions: 18	-33.6 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 166.902783 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 136.049623 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 130.706781 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 154.035874 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 143.12931 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 83.009518 samples/min

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1584 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	364 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	394 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	89 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 12 threads / linux

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3189.080588 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 12 threads / linux System RAM: 24 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 313.57 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	8419 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1539 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3203 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	592 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.