Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

차이점
사양 벤치마크 사용 후기

차이점

고려해야 하는 이유
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

버그 신고하기

더 많은 코어 수

10 more cores

14 4
더 빠른 터보 클럭 속도

주변 7% higher specified turbo frequency

4.5 GHz 4.2 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

28 W 45 W

고려해야 하는 이유
AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

버그 신고하기

더 빠른 클럭 속도

주변 167% 더 나은 클럭 속도

3.2 GHz 1.2 GHz

사양

기술 데이터

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

CPU 제품군 및 그룹

비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.

가족

Intel Core Ultra Series 1 Ryzen
세그먼트

Mobile Mobile
Form Factor

- Laptops / Desktops
Series

- Ryzen 7000 Series

CPU 기술 사양

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

CPU 코어

14 4
CPU 스레드

18 8
E-core Base Clock

0.7 GHz -
Efficient Cores

8 -
Low Power Efficient-cores

2 -
Max. Boost Clock

4.5 GHz 4.2 GHz
P-core Base Clock

1.2 GHz -
Performance Cores

4 -
Base Frequency

- 3.2 GHz
오버클러킹

- 아니요

IGPU

내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.

GPU 이름

Intel Arc graphics None
GPU Turbo

2200 MHz -

메모리 사양 및 PCI

지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS 그리고 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.

최대. Memory

96 GB -
메모리 채널

2 2
메모리 유형

Up to LPDDR5/X 7467 MT/s DDR5
PCIe

- PCIe 4.0

열 관리

TDP 요구 사항 비교 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Turbo Power

115 W -
Minimum Assured Power

20 W -
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

28 W -
Configurable TDP

- 35-53 W
Default TDP

- 45 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

- 95 °C

기술 및 확장 기능

아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.

L3-Cache

18 MB 8 MB
Official specification sheet

https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf -
릴리스 날짜

Q4/2023 -
소켓

FCBGA2049 FP7r2
Codename

- Rembrandt R
L2-Cache

- 2 MB
기술

- TSMC 6nm FinFET

벤치마크

성능 테스트 CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 1

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS	Result difference¹
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows	118.248036 samples/min Submissions: 8	78.461488 samples/min Submissions: 18	-33.6 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 166.902783 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 136.049623 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 130.706781 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 154.035874 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 143.12931 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 83.009518 samples/min

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1584 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	364 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	394 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	89 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 12 threads / linux

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3189.080588 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 12 threads / linux System RAM: 24 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 313.57 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	8419 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1539 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3203 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	592 points	System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.