产品系列示意图。
什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-12450HX 或 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-12450HX has a base frequency of 2.40 GHz (4.40 GHz). 8 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. 发布于 Q2/2022.
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has a base frequency of 1.2 GHz. 14 / 18 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 28 W. 发布于 Q4/2023.
需要考虑的原因 共同立场 Intel Core i5-12450HX 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
6 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Intel Core i5-12450HX
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 和 Intel Core i5-12450HX. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-12450HX 和 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-12450HX 和 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12450HX | Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 134.365469 samples/min Submissions: 33 | 118.248036 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -12.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 122.270274 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 130.706781 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +6.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 130.998985 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 136.049623 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +3.9 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 123.501884 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 166.902783 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +35.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | 1584 points | System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | 364 points | System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | 394 points | System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | 89 points | System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | 3189.080588 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 12 threads / linux System RAM: 24 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 313.57 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12450HX | 3607.620738 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: LENOVO / LNVNB161216 Duration: 277.191 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | 8419 points | System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | 1539 points | System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | 3203 points | System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | 592 points | System: Alldocube iWork GT Ultra CPU / power label: Ultra 5 125H 64 W / 28 W Graphics: Arc 7-Core 2200 MHz RAM: 16 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |