AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Seleccionar processador 2
Seleccionar placa de vídeo 1
Seleccionar placa de vídeo 2
User rating
star star star star star
Lançado
Q1/2025
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ilustração da família.

Processador AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, especificações e padrões de referência

No processador de visão geral AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, cujo lançamento ocorreu em Q1 2025. Aqui estão todas as características técnicas e avaliação de desempenho de AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 em benchmarks. Sugerimos examinar todos os dados e compará-los com o modelo competitivo. A frequência do relógio de base do modelo é 3 GHz, todos os núcleos são 16 / 32. O processador suporta 256-bit LPDDR5x e está instalado na placa-mãe em FP11. O TDP estimado para CPU é 55 W.

Especificações

Dados técnicos
Geração e série de processadores
  • Série
    Ryzen
  • Form Factor
    Laptops / Desktops
  • Nome
    AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
  • Segmento
    Mobile
  • Series
    Ryzen AI Max 300 Series
Núcleos de CPU e Frequência Base
  • Base Frequency
    3 GHz
  • Núcleos de CPU
    16
  • Roscas de CPU
    32
  • Max. Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz
Gráficos internos
  • GPU Frequency
    2900 MHz
  • Nome da GPU
    Radeon 8060S Graphics
  • Graphics Cores
    40
Memória & PCIe
  • Tipo de memória
    256-bit LPDDR5x
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0
Consumo de energia
  • Configurable TDP
    45-120 W
  • Default TDP
    55 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C
Detalhes técnicos
  • Availability window (manufacturer)
    Q1 2025
  • Codename
    Strix Halo
  • Date evidence scope
    Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source.
  • Кеш L2
    16 MB
  • Кеш L3
    64 MB
  • Data de lançamento
    Q1/2025
  • Socket
    FP11
  • Processo técnico
    TSMC 4nm FinFET
Posições em todos os rankings

Posições comuns AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.

No data

Benchmarks

Testes de desempenho CPU

Published results: 4

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settingsAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 447.642125 samples/min Submissions: 12
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 445.528248 samples/min Submissions: 12
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 548.440615 samples/min Submissions: 5
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 284.491844 samples/min Submissions: 17

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
7582 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
464 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1710 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1860 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
116 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
115 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1813 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
114 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
44735 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 1280x720
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
35314 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
2027 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
13988 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
796 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
30087 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 1920x1080
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Time Spy Graphics / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
11164 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 2560x1440
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
10286 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution:
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
10636 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution:
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Comparable benchmark results are required to suggest performance alternatives.

*

PL1 is the sustained processor power limit; PL2 is the short-term turbo power limit. They are not measured performance or efficiency.

Os valores são utilizados para seleccionar o sistema de arrefecimento e alimentação de energia óptimos.

Avalie o processador
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Últimas comparações