AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — Specifications and Blender benchmarks

仕様ベンチマーク同義語

仕様

技術データ

プロセッサーの世代とシリーズ

シリーズ
Ryzen
Form Factor
Laptops / Desktops
名称
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
セグメント
Mobile
Series
Ryzen AI Max 300 Series

CPUコアとベース周波数

Base Frequency
3 GHz
CPUコア
16
CPUスレッド
32
Max. Boost Clock
5.1 GHz

内部グラフィックス

GPU Frequency
2900 MHz
GPU名
Radeon 8060S Graphics
Graphics Cores
40

メモリ＆PCIe

メモリータイプ
256-bit LPDDR5x
PCIe
PCIe 4.0

エネルギー消費量

Configurable TDP
45-120 W
Default TDP
55 W
Maximum Operating Temperature
100 °C

技術的な詳細

Availability window (manufacturer)
Q1 2025
Codename
Strix Halo
Date evidence scope
Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source.
L2-Cache
16 MB
L3-Cache
64 MB
発売日
Q1/2025
ソケット
FP11
ぎじゅつてきなかだい
TSMC 4nm FinFET

全ランキングでの順位

共通ポジション AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.

No data

ベンチマーク

性能試験 CPU

Published results: 4

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows	447.642125 samples/min Submissions: 12
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows	445.528248 samples/min Submissions: 12
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux	548.440615 samples/min Submissions: 5
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows	284.491844 samples/min Submissions: 17

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
7582 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
464 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
1710 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
1860 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
116 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
115 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
1813 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
114 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU / integrated graphics

Result	Reported conditions
44735 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 1280x720 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
35314 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
2027 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Result	Reported conditions
13988 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Result	Reported conditions
796 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics / integrated graphics

Result	Reported conditions
30087 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 1920x1080 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Time Spy Graphics / integrated graphics

Result	Reported conditions
11164 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 2560x1440 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Result	Reported conditions
10286 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Result	Reported conditions
10636 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.