AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Select processor 2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2025
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Family illustration.

Processor AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, specifications and benchmarks

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Processor is being reviewed, the release of which was held in Q1 2025. Here are all the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395’s specifications and performance estimation in benchmark. We offer to study all the data and compare it with a competing model. The base clock frequency of the model is 3 GHz, total of cores is 16 / 32. The CPU supports 256-bit LPDDR5x and is installed in the motherboard on Socket FP11. The TDP for CPU is 55 W.

Specifications

Technical data
CPU generation and family
  • Family
    Ryzen
  • Form Factor
    Laptops / Desktops
  • Name
    AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
  • Segment
    Mobile
  • Series
    Ryzen AI Max 300 Series
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
  • Base Frequency
    3 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    16
  • CPU Threads
    32
  • Max. Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz
Internal Graphics
  • GPU Frequency
    2900 MHz
  • GPU name
    Radeon 8060S Graphics
  • Graphics Cores
    40
Memory & PCIe
  • Memory type
    256-bit LPDDR5x
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0
Thermal Management
  • Configurable TDP
    45-120 W
  • Default TDP
    55 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C
Technical details
  • Availability window (manufacturer)
    Q1 2025
  • Codename
    Strix Halo
  • Date evidence scope
    Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source.
  • L2-Cache
    16 MB
  • L3-Cache
    64 MB
  • Release date
    Q1/2025
  • Socket
    FP11
  • Technology
    TSMC 4nm FinFET
Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPU

Published results: 4

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settingsAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 447.642125 samples/min Submissions: 12
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 445.528248 samples/min Submissions: 12
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 548.440615 samples/min Submissions: 5
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 284.491844 samples/min Submissions: 17

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
7582 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
464 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1710 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1860 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
116 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
115 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1813 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
114 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
44735 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 1280x720
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
35314 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
2027 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
13988 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
796 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
30087 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 1920x1080
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Time Spy Graphics / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
11164 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 2560x1440
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
10286 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution:
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

ResultReported conditions
10636 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution:
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Comparable benchmark results are required to suggest performance alternatives.

*

PL1 is the sustained processor power limit; PL2 is the short-term turbo power limit. They are not measured performance or efficiency.

The values are used to select the optimal cooling system and power supply.

Rate the processor
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Latest comparisons