Intel Core i7-12650H vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900 — 规格、性能、测试

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i7-12650H

报告一个错误

更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 9% higher specified turbo frequency

4.70 GHz 4.30 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

45 W 65 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i7-12650H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

194 place

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 9 3900

报告一个错误

更高的时钟速度

左右 35% 更好的时钟速度

3.10 GHz 2.30 GHz
更多的核心数量

2 more cores

12 10

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 3900 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

254 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

98 place
Monero Hashrate kH/s

25 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

2 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

5 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

52 place

规格

技术数据

Intel Core i7-12650H

AMD Ryzen 9 3900

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

Intel Core i 12000H AMD Ryzen 3000
系列

Intel Core i7 AMD Ryzen
一代人

12 3
分段

Mobile Desktop / Server
Successor

- AMD Ryzen 9 5900

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

A-Core

6x Golden Cove -
B-Core

4x Gracemont -
Base Frequency

2.3 GHz 3.1 GHz
核心架构

hybrid (big.LITTLE) normal
CPU核数

10 12
CPU线程

16 24
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
超频

没有是
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

4.7 GHz 4.3 GHz
Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)

3.8 GHz -
Turbo Frequency (12 Cores)

- 没有涡轮增压

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

12 -
执行单位

48 -
一代人

12 -
GPU Frequency

400 MHz -
GPU名称

Intel UHD Graphics 11th Gen (64 EU) 没有iGPU
GPU Turbo

1400 MHz 没有涡轮增压
Max. displays

3 -
Max. GPU Memory

8 GB -
发布日期

Q2/2020 -
着色器

512 -
技术过程

10 nm -

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

Decode 没有
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode 没有
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

Decode / Encode 没有
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

Decode / Encode 没有
JPEG

Decode / Encode 没有
VC-1

Decode 没有
VP8

Decode 没有
VP9

Decode / Encode 没有

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 9 3900 和 Intel Core i7-12650H. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

没有没有
最大内存

64 GB 128 GB
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

DDR4-3200DDR5-4800LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-5200 DDR4-3200
PCIe

4.0 x 20 -
PCIe通道

- 20
PCIe版本

- 4.0

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-12650H 和 AMD Ryzen 9 3900 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C 95 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

45 W 65 W
TDP (PL2)

115 W -

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-12650H 和 AMD Ryzen 9 3900, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Alder Lake H Matisse (Zen 2)
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
L2-Cache

9.5 MB -
L2-Cache

24 MB 64 MB
发布日期

Q1/2022 Q3/2019
插座

BGA 1744 AM4
技术过程

10 nm 7 nm
虚拟化

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d AMD-V, SVM

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 3

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	Intel Core i7-12650H	AMD Ryzen 9 3900	Result difference¹
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows	153.011754 samples/min Submissions: 28	247.120881 samples/min Submissions: 6	+61.5 %
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows	149.824643 samples/min Submissions: 36	239.781173 samples/min Submissions: 9	+60.0 %
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows	154.264949 samples/min Submissions: 40	235.988593 samples/min Submissions: 7	+53.0 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i7-12650H

Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 149.831587 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 137.051635 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 136.820121 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 9 3900

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 24 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 9 3900	14066.379244 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 710.915 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / linux

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i7-12650H	5799.051275 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 172.442 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.