Intel Core i5-12500H vs Intel Core i7-12650H

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i5-12500H

报告一个错误

更高的时钟速度

左右 9% 更好的时钟速度

2.50 GHz 2.30 GHz
更多的核心数量

2 more cores

12 10

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i5-12500H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

160 place

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i7-12650H

报告一个错误

更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 4 % higher specified turbo frequency

4.70 GHz 4.50 GHz

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i7-12650H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

194 place

规格

技术数据

Intel Core i5-12500H

Intel Core i7-12650H

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

Intel Core i 12000H Intel Core i 12000H
系列

Intel Core i5 Intel Core i7
一代人

12 12
过去的模式

Intel Core i5-11500H -
分段

Mobile Mobile

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

A-Core

4x Golden Cove 6x Golden Cove
B-Core

8x Gracemont 4x Gracemont
Base Frequency

2.5 GHz 2.3 GHz
核心架构

hybrid (big.LITTLE) hybrid (big.LITTLE)
CPU核数

12 10
CPU线程

16 16
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
超频

没有没有
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

4.5 GHz 4.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency (12 Cores)

3.2 GHz -
Turbo Frequency (10 Cores)

- 3.8 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

12.1 12
执行单位

80 48
一代人

13 12
GPU Frequency

400 MHz 400 MHz
GPU名称

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Alder Lake) Intel UHD Graphics 11th Gen (64 EU)
GPU Turbo

1300 MHz 1400 MHz
Max. displays

4 3
Max. GPU Memory

64 GB 8 GB
发布日期

Q1/2022 Q2/2020
着色器

640 512
技术过程

10 nm 10 nm

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

Decode Decode
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
JPEG

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
VC-1

Decode Decode
VP8

Decode Decode
VP9

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-12650H 和 Intel Core i5-12500H. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

没有没有
最大内存

64 GB 64 GB
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

DDR4-3200DDR5-4800LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-5200 DDR4-3200DDR5-4800LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-5200
PCIe

4.0 x 28 4.0 x 20

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-12500H 和 Intel Core i7-12650H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C 100 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

45 W 45 W
TDP (PL2)

115 W 115 W

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-12500H 和 Intel Core i7-12650H, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Alder Lake H Alder Lake H
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
L2-Cache

9 MB 9.5 MB
L2-Cache

18 MB 24 MB
发布日期

Q1/2022 Q1/2022
插座

BGA 1744 BGA 1744
技术过程

10 nm 10 nm
虚拟化

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 6

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	Intel Core i5-12500H	Intel Core i7-12650H	Result difference¹
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows	137.652303 samples/min Submissions: 65	153.011754 samples/min Submissions: 28	+11.2 %
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows	142.023008 samples/min Submissions: 27	136.820121 samples/min Submissions: 19	-3.7 %
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows	143.993174 samples/min Submissions: 23	137.051635 samples/min Submissions: 16	-4.8 %
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows	149.547825 samples/min Submissions: 54	149.824643 samples/min Submissions: 36	+0.2 %
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows	140.3944 samples/min Submissions: 20	149.831587 samples/min Submissions: 17	+6.7 %
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows	139.293078 samples/min Submissions: 65	154.264949 samples/min Submissions: 40	+10.7 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i5-12500H

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux 140.320401 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 172.389039 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 170.586795 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 149.533488 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 104.793666 samples/min

Intel Core i7-12650H

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / linux

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i7-12650H	5799.051275 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 172.442 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 13 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i5-12500H	2569.472102 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 13 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / FX507ZC4 Duration: 389.185 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i5-12500H 和 Intel Core i7-12650H.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

iGPU的性能--游戏中的内部GPU

Higher values are better in this metric.

1611.000000

Intel Core i5-12500H

1434.000000

Intel Core i7-12650H