AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225H

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 7 260

报告一个错误

更高的时钟速度

左右 124% 更好的时钟速度

3.8 GHz 1.7 GHz
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 4% higher specified turbo frequency

5.1 GHz 4.9 GHz

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H

报告一个错误

更多的核心数量

6 more cores

14 8
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

28 W 45 W

规格

技术数据

AMD Ryzen 7 260

Intel Core Ultra 5 225H

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

系列

Ryzen Intel Core Ultra Series 2
Form Factor

Laptops / Desktops -
分段

Mobile Mobile
Series

Ryzen 200 Series -

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

3.8 GHz -
CPU核数

8 14
CPU线程

16 14
Max. Boost Clock

5.1 GHz 4.9 GHz
超频

没有 -
E-core Base Clock

- 1.3 GHz
Efficient Cores

- 8
Low Power Efficient-cores

- 2
P-core Base Clock

- 1.7 GHz
Performance Cores

- 4

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

GPU Frequency

2700 MHz -
GPU名称

AMD Radeon 780M Intel Arc 130T GPU
Graphics Cores

12 -
GPU Turbo

- 2200 MHz

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core Ultra 5 225H 和 AMD Ryzen 7 260. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

DDR5 (FP8) / LPDDR5X (FP8) / LPDDR5X (FP7) / DDR5 (FP7r2) Up to LPDDR5/X 8400 MT/s
PCIe

PCIe 4.0 -
最大内存

- 128 GB

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 7 260 和 Intel Core Ultra 5 225H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Configurable TDP

35-54 W -
Default TDP

45 W -
Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C -
Maximum Turbo Power

- 115 W
Minimum Assured Power

- 20 W
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

- 28 W

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 7 260 和 Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

Codename

Hawk Point -
L2-Cache

8 MB -
L2-Cache

16 MB 18 MB
发布日期

2025-02-18 Q1/2025
插座

FP8 / FP7r2 / FP7 FCBGA2049
技术过程

TSMC 4nm FinFET -
Official specification sheet

- https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 1

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	AMD Ryzen 7 260	Intel Core Ultra 5 225H	Result difference¹
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows	252.250094 samples/min Submissions: 16	198.131999 samples/min Submissions: 21	-21.5 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen 7 260

Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 244.211512 samples/min

Intel Core Ultra 5 225H

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 200.663934 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 194.771507 samples/min
Blender 5.0.0 / CPU / Windows 199.832494 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 228.434796 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 179.47113 samples/min

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 10 threads / linux

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 260	3441.641801 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 10 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / FA608UMI Duration: 290.559 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.