ベストな選択とは Intel Core i5-12400F または Intel Core i9-13900KF? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか？
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2022.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2022.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
場所
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
共通ポジション Intel Core i5-12400F 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
場所
より多くのコア数
18 more cores
6
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-13900KF 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i5-12400F
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Intel Core i 13000
Intel Core i9
13
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Raptor Cove
16x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
24
32
はい
はい
-
-
3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz)
2.20 GHz (4.30 GHz)
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
None
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i9-13900KF と Intel Core i5-12400F. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
はい
128 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5600
5.0 x 20
89.6 GB/s
はい
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i5-12400F と Intel Core i9-13900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
125 W
253 W
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i5-12400F と Intel Core i9-13900KF, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Raptor Lake S
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
32 MB
36 MB
Q4/2022
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Technical data sheet
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
564 $
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400F | Intel Core i9-13900KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 509.21501 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +200.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | 477.248565 samples/min Submissions: 46 | +209.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 477.053533 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 580.652835 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +193.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | 462.552075 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +217.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 454.997543 samples/min Submissions: 69 | +205.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 499.75302 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +215.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 197.430931 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 643.35896 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 498.99971 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +216.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 12476.450699 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z790-P Duration: 80.151 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 Intel Core i5-12400F と Intel Core i9-13900KF.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
