Quel est le meilleur choix ? Intel Core i5-12400F ou Intel Core i9-13900KF? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Nous avons préparé un comparatif pour vous aider à choisir le meilleur processeur. Comparez leurs spécifications et leurs benchmarks.
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Sorti en Q1/2022.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Sorti en Q4/2022.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
place
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
Positions communes Intel Core i5-12400F CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
place
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
18 more cores
6
Positions communes Intel Core i9-13900KF CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Intel Core i5-12400F
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Intel Core i 13000
Intel Core i9
13
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Raptor Cove
16x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
24
32
Oui
Oui
-
-
3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz)
2.20 GHz (4.30 GHz)
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
None
Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Non
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par Intel Core i9-13900KF et Intel Core i5-12400F. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Oui
128 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5600
5.0 x 20
89.6 GB/s
Oui
Comparez les exigences du TDP Intel Core i5-12400F et Intel Core i9-13900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
125 W
253 W
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par Intel Core i5-12400F et Intel Core i9-13900KF, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
Raptor Lake S
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
32 MB
36 MB
Q4/2022
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Technical data sheet
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
564 $
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400F | Intel Core i9-13900KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 509.21501 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +200.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | 477.248565 samples/min Submissions: 46 | +209.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 477.053533 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 580.652835 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +193.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | 462.552075 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +217.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 454.997543 samples/min Submissions: 69 | +205.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 499.75302 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +215.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 197.430931 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 643.35896 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 498.99971 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +216.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 12476.450699 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z790-P Duration: 80.151 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
En vous basant sur les résultats de plusieurs benchmarks, vous pouvez estimer avec plus de précision la différence de performance entre Intel Core i5-12400F et Intel Core i9-13900KF.
Comparez les valeurs des tests synthétiques et choisissez le meilleur processeur !
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
