What's the best choice Intel Core i5-12400F or Intel Core i9-13900KF? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2022.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2022.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
place
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
Common positions Intel Core i5-12400F CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
place
More number of cores
18 more cores
6
Common positions Intel Core i9-13900KF CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Intel Core i5-12400F
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Intel Core i 13000
Intel Core i9
13
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Raptor Cove
16x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
24
32
Yes
Yes
-
-
3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz)
2.20 GHz (4.30 GHz)
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
None
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i9-13900KF and Intel Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Yes
128 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5600
5.0 x 20
89.6 GB/s
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i5-12400F and Intel Core i9-13900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
125 W
253 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i5-12400F and Intel Core i9-13900KF, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Raptor Lake S
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
32 MB
36 MB
Q4/2022
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Technical data sheet
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
564 $
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400F | Intel Core i9-13900KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 509.21501 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +200.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | 477.248565 samples/min Submissions: 46 | +209.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 477.053533 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 580.652835 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +193.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | 462.552075 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +217.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 454.997543 samples/min Submissions: 69 | +205.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 499.75302 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +215.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 197.430931 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 643.35896 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 498.99971 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +216.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 12476.450699 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z790-P Duration: 80.151 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Core i5-12400F and Intel Core i9-13900KF.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
