Qual è la scelta migliore Intel Core i5-12400F o Intel Core i9-13900KF? Quale processore è più veloce?
Abbiamo preparato un confronto per aiutarvi a scegliere il processore migliore. Confrontate le loro specifiche e i loro benchmark.
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Rilasciato in Q1/2022.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Rilasciato in Q4/2022.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
posto
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
Posizioni comuni Intel Core i5-12400F CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
posto
Più numero di core
18 more cores
6
Posizioni comuni Intel Core i9-13900KF CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Intel Core i5-12400F
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Intel Core i 13000
Intel Core i9
13
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Raptor Cove
16x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
24
32
Sì
Sì
-
-
3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz)
2.20 GHz (4.30 GHz)
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
None
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da Intel Core i9-13900KF e Intel Core i5-12400F. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
Sì
128 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5600
5.0 x 20
89.6 GB/s
Sì
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP Intel Core i5-12400F e Intel Core i9-13900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
125 W
253 W
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da Intel Core i5-12400F e Intel Core i9-13900KF, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
Raptor Lake S
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
32 MB
36 MB
Q4/2022
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Technical data sheet
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
564 $
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400F | Intel Core i9-13900KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 509.21501 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +200.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | 477.248565 samples/min Submissions: 46 | +209.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 477.053533 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 580.652835 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +193.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | 462.552075 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +217.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 454.997543 samples/min Submissions: 69 | +205.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 499.75302 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +215.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 197.430931 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 643.35896 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 498.99971 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +216.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 12476.450699 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z790-P Duration: 80.151 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Sulla base dei risultati di diversi benchmark, è possibile stimare con maggiore precisione la differenza di prestazioni tra Intel Core i5-12400F e Intel Core i9-13900KF.
Confrontate i valori dei test sintetici e scegliete il processore migliore!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
