Cuál es la mejor opción Intel Core i5-12400F o Intel Core i9-13900KF? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Hemos preparado una comparación para ayudarte a elegir el mejor procesador. Compara sus especificaciones y puntos de referencia.
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en Q1/2022.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Publicado en Q4/2022.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
lugar
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i5-12400F CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
lugar
Más número de núcleos
18 more cores
6
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i9-13900KF CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Intel Core i5-12400F
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Intel Core i 13000
Intel Core i9
13
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Raptor Cove
16x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
24
32
Sí
Sí
-
-
3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz)
2.20 GHz (4.30 GHz)
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
None
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por Intel Core i9-13900KF y Intel Core i5-12400F. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
Sí
128 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5600
5.0 x 20
89.6 GB/s
Sí
Compara los requisitos del TDP Intel Core i5-12400F y Intel Core i9-13900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
125 W
253 W
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por Intel Core i5-12400F y Intel Core i9-13900KF, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
Raptor Lake S
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
32 MB
36 MB
Q4/2022
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Technical data sheet
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
564 $
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400F | Intel Core i9-13900KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 509.21501 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +200.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | 477.248565 samples/min Submissions: 46 | +209.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 477.053533 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 580.652835 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +193.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | 462.552075 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +217.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 454.997543 samples/min Submissions: 69 | +205.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 499.75302 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +215.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 197.430931 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 643.35896 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +225.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 498.99971 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +216.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 12476.450699 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z790-P Duration: 80.151 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Basándose en los resultados de varias pruebas comparativas, puede estimar con mayor precisión la diferencia de rendimiento entre Intel Core i5-12400F y Intel Core i9-13900KF.
Compare los valores de las pruebas sintéticas y elija el mejor procesador.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Polish
Chinese
Korean
