ベストな選択とは Intel Core i7-13700KF または Intel Core i9-13900KF? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
Intel Core i7-13700KF has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz (5.40 GHz). 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2022.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2022.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
共通ポジション Intel Core i7-13700KF 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
より多くのコア数
8 more cores
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-13900KF 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i7-13700KF
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i9-13900KF と Intel Core i7-13700KF. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i7-13700KF と Intel Core i9-13900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i7-13700KF と Intel Core i9-13900KF, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-13700KF | Intel Core i9-13900KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 410.876974 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 509.21501 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +23.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 435.185771 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 616.444823 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +41.7 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 359.623683 samples/min Submissions: 83 | 477.248565 samples/min Submissions: 46 | +32.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 358.747216 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 477.053533 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +33.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 368.061163 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 462.552075 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +25.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 358.406062 samples/min Submissions: 62 | 454.997543 samples/min Submissions: 69 | +27.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 370.516306 samples/min Submissions: 38 | 499.75302 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +34.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 465.877278 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 643.35896 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +38.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 380.945816 samples/min Submissions: 114 | 498.99971 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +31.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 12476.450699 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z790-P Duration: 80.151 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13700KF | 13077.365695 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.17.0 / 1M / 18 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO Z690-A DDR4(MS-7D25) Duration: 76.468 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 Intel Core i7-13700KF と Intel Core i9-13900KF.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.