Select processor 1
Select processor 2
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600
Matrox LUMA A310

SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600 vs Matrox LUMA A310. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600
Released
Q2/2023
Overall score
star star star star star
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310

What's the best choice SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600 or Matrox LUMA A310? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600 has a maximum frequency of 1.770 GHz+ 3 %. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

Matrox LUMA A310 has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

Differences

  • More memory

    50% more memory

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data
Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 11% better clock speed

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.770 GHz+ 3 %

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place

Specifications

Technical data
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600 SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600 and Matrox LUMA A310, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon RX 7600 left arrow Intel Arc A310 Graphics
  • GPU Chip
    Navi 33 XL (RDNA 3) left arrow ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    32 left arrow 96
  • Shader
    2048 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 16
  • Texture Units
    128 left arrow 32
  • Raytracing Cores
    32 left arrow 6
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    8 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    2.250 GHz left arrow 1.938 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    18 Gbps left arrow 15.5 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    288 GB/s left arrow 124 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 64 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600 and Matrox LUMA A310. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.770 GHz+ 3 % left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.755 GHz+ 4 % left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    2.355 GHz+ 5 % left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    185 W+ 12 % left arrow 30 W-60 %
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 8-Pin left arrow --
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600 and Matrox LUMA A310.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow --
  • Fan 1
    2 x 90 mm left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Passive
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.1a left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4 left arrow 4x DP v2.1
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    Yes left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    240 mm left arrow 168 mm
  • Height
    107 mm left arrow 69 mm
  • Width
    44 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 1 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Matrox LUMA A310 and SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 8
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q2/2023
  • Launch Price
    269 $ (Reference) left arrow --
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    11324-01-20G left arrow LUMA-A310
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600 and Matrox LUMA A310.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
22.57
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7600
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310
-->

Latest comparisons