What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310 or Intel Arc A580 Graphics? Which graphics card is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Matrox LUMA A310 has a base frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.
Intel Arc A580 Graphics has a base frequency of 1.700 GHz. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in 2022.
Higher clock speed
Around 18% better clock speed
Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
More memory
100% more memory
Common positions Intel Arc A580 Graphics GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics, chip, information processing units.
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics.
Connectivity and connections.
Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.
Built-in support for video and image compression standards.
The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices
Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Intel Arc A580 Graphics and Matrox LUMA A310.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310 and Intel Arc A580 Graphics.
Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Game frame rates
Archived results. The original measurement method and test conditions have not been verified.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.