What's the best choice Intel Xeon w9-3475X or AMD EPYC 9654P? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Intel Xeon w9-3475X has a base frequency of 2.20 GHz. 36 / 72 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 300 W. Released in Q1/2023.
AMD EPYC 9654P has a base frequency of 2.40 GHz. 96 / 192 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 360 W. Released in Q4/2022.
Reasons to consider Higher turbo clock speed
Around 30% higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Common positions Intel Xeon w9-3475X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 9% better clock speed
More number of cores
60 more cores
Common positions AMD EPYC 9654P CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD EPYC 9654P and Intel Xeon w9-3475X. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon w9-3475X and AMD EPYC 9654P Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon w9-3475X and AMD EPYC 9654P, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9654P | 82584.566596 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 10M / 192 threads / linux System RAM: 192 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: Dell Inc. / 01KWRR Duration: 121.088 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon w9-3475X | 23620.503542 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 72 threads / windows System RAM: 128 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE Duration: 423.361 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon w9-3475X and AMD EPYC 9654P.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.