Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Atom E3825
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron G3900 vs Intel Atom E3825. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Celeron G3900
Released
Q4/2013
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Atom E3825
Intel Atom E3825

What's the best choice Intel Celeron G3900 or Intel Atom E3825? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron G3900 has a base frequency of 2.80 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 51 W. Released in Q1/2016.

Intel Atom E3825 has a base frequency of 1.33 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6 W. Released in Q4/2013.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    279 left arrow place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 111% better clock speed

    2.80 GHz left arrow 1.33 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron G3900 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    254 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    297 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    693 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    862 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    792 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    976 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1324 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    503 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    624 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    455 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    597 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    234 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    875 place
Intel Atom E3825 Reasons to consider
Intel Atom E3825
Report a bug
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    6 W left arrow 51 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom E3825 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1681 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    899 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    897 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1205 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron G3900 Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Atom E3825 Intel Atom E3825
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron G3000 left arrow Intel Atom E3800
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 4
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2.8 GHz left arrow 1.33 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12.0 left arrow 11.2
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow 4
  • Generation
    9 left arrow 7
  • GPU Frequency
    350 MHz left arrow 530 MHz
  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 510 left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU Turbo
    950 MHz left arrow 530 MHz
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 2
  • Max. GPU Memory
    32 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow Q3/2013
  • Shader
    96 left arrow 32
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 22 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Atom E3825 and Intel Celeron G3900. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1
  • Memory type
    DDR4-2133 left arrow DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow -
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron G3900 and Intel Atom E3825 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    51 W left arrow 6 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron G3900 and Intel Atom E3825, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Skylake S left arrow Bay Trail
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    2 MB left arrow 1 MB
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q4/2013
  • Socket
    LGA 1151 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron G3900 and Intel Atom E3825.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

182.000000
Intel Celeron G3900
34.000000
Intel Atom E3825
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

2758.000000
Intel Celeron G3900
616.000000
Intel Atom E3825
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

4875.000000
Intel Celeron G3900
1121.000000
Intel Atom E3825
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

3234.000000
Intel Celeron G3900
579.000000
Intel Atom E3825

Latest comparisons