What's the best choice Baikal-M or Intel Core i9-12900KF? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Baikal-M has a base frequency of 1.5 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 30 W. Released in Q3/2019.
Intel Core i9-12900KF has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2021.
Reasons to consider Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
Common positions Baikal-M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
place
Higher clock speed
Around 147% better clock speed
1.5 GHz
More number of cores
8 more cores
8
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 152 % higher specified turbo frequency
2.1 GHz
Common positions Intel Core i9-12900KF CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Baikal-M
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i9
Desktop / Server
12
Intel Core i9-11900KF
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
3.7 GHz
16
24
8x Golden Cove
8x Gracemont
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes
Yes
5.3 GHz
5 GHz
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
-
None
-
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i9-12900KF and Baikal-M. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
No
256 GB
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
-
20
5.0
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Baikal-M and Intel Core i9-12900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
125 W
100 °C
228 W / 56 s
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Baikal-M and Intel Core i9-12900KF, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Alder Lake S
-
30 MB
Q4/2021
LGA 1700
10 nm
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
3.75 MB
BX8071512900KF
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900KF | 10268.669468 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 10M / 22 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / MEG Z690 ACE (MS-7D27) Duration: 973.836 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Baikal-M and Intel Core i9-12900KF.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
