Baikal-M
Elbrus-8S
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Baikal-M vs Elbrus-8S. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2019
Baikal-M
Baikal-M
Released
Q3/2015
Overall score
star star star star star
Elbrus-8S
Elbrus-8S

What's the best choice Baikal-M or Elbrus-8S? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Baikal-M has a maximum frequency of 1.6 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 30 W. Released in Q3/2019.

Elbrus-8S has a maximum frequency of 1.3 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 80 W. Released in Q3/2015.

Differences

Baikal-M Reasons to consider
Baikal-M
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 19% better clock speed

    1.6 GHz left arrow 1.3 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    30 W left arrow 80 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Baikal-M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1083 place
  • CoreMark
    5 place
Elbrus-8S Reasons to consider
Elbrus-8S
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Elbrus-8S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Baikal-M Baikal-M
Elbrus-8S Elbrus-8S
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop
  • Family
    Baikal left arrow Elbrus
  • CPU group
    Baikal-M left arrow Elbrus-8
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    1.5 GHz left arrow 1.3 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 8
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Elbrus-8S and Baikal-M. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3/DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR3-1600
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 4
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Baikal-M and Elbrus-8S to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    30 W left arrow 80 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Baikal-M and Baikal-M, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • L2-Cache
    4x1024 KB left arrow 4 MB
  • L3-Cache
    8 MB left arrow 16 MB
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    FCBGA-1521 left arrow FCBGA 2028
  • Release date
    Q3/2019 left arrow Q1/2016

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Baikal-M and Elbrus-8S.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Latest comparisons