Baikal-M
Elbrus-8SB
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Baikal-M vs Elbrus-8SB. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2019
Baikal-M
Baikal-M
Released
Q1/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
Elbrus-8SB
Elbrus-8SB

What's the best choice Baikal-M or Elbrus-8SB? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Baikal-M has a maximum frequency of 1.6 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 30 W. Released in Q3/2019.

Elbrus-8SB has a maximum frequency of 1.5 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 90 W. Released in Q1/2020.

Differences

Baikal-M Reasons to consider
Baikal-M
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 6% better clock speed

    1.6 GHz left arrow 1.5 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    30 W left arrow 90 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Baikal-M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1083 place
  • CoreMark
    5 place
Elbrus-8SB Reasons to consider
Elbrus-8SB
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Elbrus-8SB CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1283 place
  • CoreMark
    6 place

Specifications

Technical data
Baikal-M Baikal-M
Elbrus-8SB Elbrus-8SB
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop
  • Family
    Baikal left arrow Elbrus
  • CPU group
    Baikal-M left arrow Elbrus-8
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    1.5 GHz left arrow 1.5 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 8
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Elbrus-8SB and Baikal-M. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3/DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 4
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Baikal-M and Elbrus-8SB to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    30 W left arrow 90 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Baikal-M and Baikal-M, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • L2-Cache
    4x1024 KB left arrow 4 MB
  • L3-Cache
    8 MB left arrow 16 MB
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    FCBGA-1521 left arrow FCBGA 2028
  • Release date
    Q3/2019 left arrow Q1/2020

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Baikal-M and Elbrus-8SB.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1524
Baikal-M
1100
Elbrus-8SB
CoreMark
CoreMark - a set of synthetic performance tests to measure the speed of central processors in embedded systems
67427
Baikal-M
43008
Elbrus-8SB

Latest comparisons