NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Unterschiede Specifications Benchmarks (tests) Testimonials

Unterschiede

Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

Einen Fehler melden

Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Einen Fehler melden

Höhere Taktfrequenz

Rund um 2% höhere taktfrequenz

1.56 GHz 1.53 GHz
Mehr Speicher

300% mehr Speicher

24 GB 6 GB

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti GPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

Passmark Performance Test GPU

1 place

Specifications

Technische Daten

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Allgemeine Informationen

Vergleich der grundlegenden technischen Daten von Grafikkarten NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, Chip, Informationsverarbeitungseinheiten.

Architektur

Turing Ampere
CUDA Cores

1408 10752
Execution Units

1408 -
GPU Chip

TU116 GA102-350-A1
L1 Cache

64 KB 128 KB
L2 Cache

1.536 MB 6 MB
Render Output Einheiten

48 112
Textur Einheiten

88 336
Based on

- GA102
Shader

- 10752

Speichereinstellungen

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

Memory Bandwidth

192.1 GB/s 1,008 GB/s
Memory Bus

192 bit 384 bit
Memory Clock

2000 MHz -
Memory Data Rate

8 Gbps -
Speichergröße

6 GB 24 GB
Speicher Typ

GDDR5 GDDR6X
Memory Speed (legacy frequency label)

- 1300 MHz

Taktfrequenz

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

Grundfrequenz

1530 MHz 1560 MHz
Maximale Frequenz

1785 MHz 1860 MHz
Übertaktung

- Nein

Energieverbrauch

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

Graphics Card Power

120 W 450 W
Maximum GPU Temperature

95 °C 92 °C
System Power Supply

450 W (Minimum system power requirement) 850 W (System power requirement)
TDP

120 W 450 W

Schnittstellen

Konnektivität und Verbindungen.

DisplayPort Ports

1 × DisplayPort 1.4a 3 × DisplayPort 1.4a
DVI-Ports

1 × DVI -
HDMI-Ports

1 × HDMI 2.0 1 × HDMI 2.1
Max. Anzeigen

3 4
Other Display Outputs (unparsed)

DP 1.4a; HDMI 2.0b; DL-DVI-D HDMI
PCIe Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors

8-pin 3x PCIe 8-pin cables (adapter in box) OR 450W or greater PCIe Gen 5 cable
HDCP Version

- 2.3

Technische Daten

Technische Daten, die in Computerspielen voll ausgeschöpft werden.

CUDA

7.5 -
DirectX

12.1 12_2
Max. Auflösung

3840 × 2160 7680 × 4320
OpenCL

3.0 3.0
OpenGL

4.6 4.6
Shader Model

6.7 (6.4) 6.6
Vulkan

1.3 1.3

Abmessungen

Der Unterschied in Größe, Gewicht und Steckplatz der verglichenen Geräte

Höhe

35 mm -
Länge

229 mm -
Slot Size

Dual-slot -
Width

111 mm -

Weitere Informationen

Vergleich von Schnittstellen und Freigabeterminen für GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.

Manufacturer specification scope

NVIDIA Founders Edition/reference design. Clock specifications apply to gaming use. AIB shipping specifications and complete-system power needs may differ. NVIDIA Founders Edition/reference design. Clock specifications apply to gaming use. AIB shipping specifications and complete-system power needs may differ.
Multi-monitor support

Ja -
Process Technology

12 nm 8 nm
Datum der Veröffentlichung

Q1/2019 -

Theoretical Performance

FP16 (theoretical)

10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) 40 TFLOPS
FP32 (theoretical)

5.027 TFLOPS 40 TFLOPS
FP64 (theoretical)

157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) 0.625 TFLOPS
Pixel Rate

85.68 GPixel/s 208.3 GPixel/s
Texture Rate

157.1 GTexel/s 625.0 GTexel/s

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests GPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 9

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Result difference¹
Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Windows	595.520496 samples/min Submissions: 6	5459.157697 samples/min Submissions: 5	+816.7 %
Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Windows	675.939963 samples/min Submissions: 20	5585.151795 samples/min Submissions: 115	+726.3 %
Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Windows	675.243544 samples/min Submissions: 13	5700.575741 samples/min Submissions: 51	+744.2 %
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Linux	690.741064 samples/min Submissions: 5	5840.23445 samples/min Submissions: 8	+745.5 %
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Windows	677.894173 samples/min Submissions: 13	5490.159484 samples/min Submissions: 35	+709.9 %
Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows	689.203496 samples/min Submissions: 15	5673.136912 samples/min Submissions: 51	+723.1 %
Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Windows	695.468717 samples/min Submissions: 24	5769.869986 samples/min Submissions: 32	+729.6 %
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Linux	701.451067 samples/min Submissions: 5	6168.026652 samples/min Submissions: 16	+779.3 %
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Windows	696.090828 samples/min Submissions: 26	5124.064923 samples/min Submissions: 111	+636.1 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.