NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti — Especificaciones, rendimiento, pruebas

Diferencias Especificaciones Puntos de referencia Testimonios

Diferencias

Razones a tener en cuenta
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

Informar de un error

Razones a tener en cuenta
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Informar de un error

Mayor velocidad de reloj

En 2% mejor velocidad de reloj

1.56 GHz 1.53 GHz
Más memoria

300% más de memoria

24 GB 6 GB

Posiciones en todas las clasificaciones

Posiciones comunes NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti GPU en benchmarks populares, para comparar con otros modelos.

Passmark Performance Test GPU

1 place

Especificaciones

Datos técnicos

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Información general

Comparación de los datos técnicos básicos de las tarjetas gráficas NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 y NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, chip, unidades de procesamiento de información.

Arquitectura

Turing Ampere
CUDA Cores

1408 10752
Execution Units

1408 -
Chip GPU

TU116 GA102-350-A1
L1 Cache

64 KB 128 KB
L2 Cache

1.536 MB 6 MB
Unidades de salida de renderizado

48 112
Unidades de textura

88 336
Basado en

- GA102
Shader

- 10752

Ajustes de la memoria

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

Memory Bandwidth

192.1 GB/s 1,008 GB/s
Memory Bus

192 bit 384 bit
Memory Clock

2000 MHz -
Memory Data Rate

8 Gbps -
Tamaño de la memoria

6 GB 24 GB
Tipo de memoria

GDDR5 GDDR6X
Memory Speed (legacy frequency label)

- 1300 MHz

Frecuencia del reloj

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

Frecuencia base

1530 MHz 1560 MHz
Frecuencia máxima

1785 MHz 1860 MHz
Overclocking

- No

Consumo de energía

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

Graphics Card Power

120 W 450 W
Maximum GPU Temperature

95 °C 92 °C
System Power Supply

450 W (Minimum system power requirement) 850 W (System power requirement)
TDP

120 W 450 W

Interfaces

Conectividad y conexiones.

DisplayPort Ports

1 × DisplayPort 1.4a 3 × DisplayPort 1.4a
Puertos DVI

1 × DVI -
Puertos HDMI

1 × HDMI 2.0 1 × HDMI 2.1
Max. Muestra

3 4
Other Display Outputs (unparsed)

DP 1.4a; HDMI 2.0b; DL-DVI-D HDMI
PCIe Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors

8-pin 3x PCIe 8-pin cables (adapter in box) OR 450W or greater PCIe Gen 5 cable
HDCP Version

- 2.3

Datos técnicos

Datos técnicos que se aprovechan al máximo en los juegos de ordenador.

CUDA

7.5 -
DirectX

12.1 12_2
Resolución máxima

3840 × 2160 7680 × 4320
OpenCL

3.0 3.0
OpenGL

4.6 4.6
Shader Model

6.7 (6.4) 6.6
Vulkan

1.3 1.3

Dimensiones

La diferencia de tamaño, peso y ranura de los dispositivos comparados

Altura

35 mm -
Longitud

229 mm -
Slot Size

Dual-slot -
Width

111 mm -

Más información

Comparación de interfaces y fechas de lanzamiento de la GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti y NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.

Manufacturer specification scope

NVIDIA Founders Edition/reference design. Clock specifications apply to gaming use. AIB shipping specifications and complete-system power needs may differ. NVIDIA Founders Edition/reference design. Clock specifications apply to gaming use. AIB shipping specifications and complete-system power needs may differ.
Multi-monitor support

Sí -
Process Technology

12 nm 8 nm
Fecha de publicación

Q1/2019 -

Theoretical Performance

FP16 (theoretical)

10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) 40 TFLOPS
FP32 (theoretical)

5.027 TFLOPS 40 TFLOPS
FP64 (theoretical)

157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) 0.625 TFLOPS
Pixel Rate

85.68 GPixel/s 208.3 GPixel/s
Texture Rate

157.1 GTexel/s 625.0 GTexel/s

Puntos de referencia

Pruebas de rendimiento GPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 9

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Result difference¹
Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Windows	595.520496 samples/min Submissions: 6	5459.157697 samples/min Submissions: 5	+816.7 %
Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Windows	675.939963 samples/min Submissions: 20	5585.151795 samples/min Submissions: 115	+726.3 %
Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Windows	675.243544 samples/min Submissions: 13	5700.575741 samples/min Submissions: 51	+744.2 %
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Linux	690.741064 samples/min Submissions: 5	5840.23445 samples/min Submissions: 8	+745.5 %
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Windows	677.894173 samples/min Submissions: 13	5490.159484 samples/min Submissions: 35	+709.9 %
Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows	689.203496 samples/min Submissions: 15	5673.136912 samples/min Submissions: 51	+723.1 %
Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Windows	695.468717 samples/min Submissions: 24	5769.869986 samples/min Submissions: 32	+729.6 %
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Linux	701.451067 samples/min Submissions: 5	6168.026652 samples/min Submissions: 16	+779.3 %
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Windows	696.090828 samples/min Submissions: 26	5124.064923 samples/min Submissions: 111	+636.1 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.