NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Differenze Specifiche Benchmark (test) Testimonianze

Differenze

Motivi da considerare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

Segnala un bug

Motivi da considerare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Segnala un bug

Velocità di clock più alta

Intorno a 2% migliore velocità di clock

1.56 GHz 1.53 GHz
Più memoria

300% più memoria

24 GB 6 GB

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti GPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

Passmark Performance Test GPU

1 place

Specifiche

Dati tecnici

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Informazioni generali

Confronto dei dati tecnici di base delle schede grafiche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 e NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, chip, unità di elaborazione delle informazioni.

Architettura

Turing Ampere
CUDA Cores

1408 10752
Execution Units

1408 -
Chip GPU

TU116 GA102-350-A1
L1 Cache

64 KB 128 KB
L2 Cache

1.536 MB 6 MB
Unità di uscita del rendering

48 112
Unità di texture

88 336
Basato su

- GA102
Shader

- 10752

Impostazioni di memoria

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

Memory Bandwidth

192.1 GB/s 1,008 GB/s
Memory Bus

192 bit 384 bit
Memory Clock

2000 MHz -
Memory Data Rate

8 Gbps -
Dimensione della memoria

6 GB 24 GB
Tipo di memoria

GDDR5 GDDR6X
Memory Speed (legacy frequency label)

- 1300 MHz

Frequenza di clock

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

Frequenza di base

1530 MHz 1560 MHz
Frequenza massima

1785 MHz 1860 MHz
Overclock

- No

Consumo di energia

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

Graphics Card Power

120 W 450 W
Maximum GPU Temperature

95 °C 92 °C
System Power Supply

450 W (Minimum system power requirement) 850 W (System power requirement)
TDP

120 W 450 W

Interfacce

Connettività e collegamenti.

DisplayPort Ports

1 × DisplayPort 1.4a 3 × DisplayPort 1.4a
Porte DVI

1 × DVI -
Porte HDMI

1 × HDMI 2.0 1 × HDMI 2.1
Max. Visualizzazioni

3 4
Other Display Outputs (unparsed)

DP 1.4a; HDMI 2.0b; DL-DVI-D HDMI
PCIe Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors

8-pin 3x PCIe 8-pin cables (adapter in box) OR 450W or greater PCIe Gen 5 cable
HDCP Version

- 2.3

Dati tecnici

Dati tecnici utilizzati al massimo delle loro potenzialità nei giochi per computer.

CUDA

7.5 -
DirectX

12.1 12_2
Risoluzione massima

3840 × 2160 7680 × 4320
OpenCL

3.0 3.0
OpenGL

4.6 4.6
Shader Model

6.7 (6.4) 6.6
Vulkan

1.3 1.3

Dimensioni

La differenza di dimensioni, peso e slot dei dispositivi a confronto

Altezza

35 mm -
Lunghezza

229 mm -
Slot Size

Dual-slot -
Width

111 mm -

Ulteriori informazioni

Confronto tra le interfacce e le date di rilascio per le GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti e NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.

Manufacturer specification scope

NVIDIA Founders Edition/reference design. Clock specifications apply to gaming use. AIB shipping specifications and complete-system power needs may differ. NVIDIA Founders Edition/reference design. Clock specifications apply to gaming use. AIB shipping specifications and complete-system power needs may differ.
Multi-monitor support

Sì -
Process Technology

12 nm 8 nm
Data di rilascio

Q1/2019 -

Theoretical Performance

FP16 (theoretical)

10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) 40 TFLOPS
FP32 (theoretical)

5.027 TFLOPS 40 TFLOPS
FP64 (theoretical)

157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) 0.625 TFLOPS
Pixel Rate

85.68 GPixel/s 208.3 GPixel/s
Texture Rate

157.1 GTexel/s 625.0 GTexel/s

Benchmark (test)

Test di performance GPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 9

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Result difference¹
Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Windows	595.520496 samples/min Submissions: 6	5459.157697 samples/min Submissions: 5	+816.7 %
Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Windows	675.939963 samples/min Submissions: 20	5585.151795 samples/min Submissions: 115	+726.3 %
Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Windows	675.243544 samples/min Submissions: 13	5700.575741 samples/min Submissions: 51	+744.2 %
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Linux	690.741064 samples/min Submissions: 5	5840.23445 samples/min Submissions: 8	+745.5 %
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Windows	677.894173 samples/min Submissions: 13	5490.159484 samples/min Submissions: 35	+709.9 %
Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows	689.203496 samples/min Submissions: 15	5673.136912 samples/min Submissions: 51	+723.1 %
Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Windows	695.468717 samples/min Submissions: 24	5769.869986 samples/min Submissions: 32	+729.6 %
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Linux	701.451067 samples/min Submissions: 5	6168.026652 samples/min Submissions: 16	+779.3 %
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Windows	696.090828 samples/min Submissions: 26	5124.064923 samples/min Submissions: 111	+636.1 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.