Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 3 3100U — Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Unterschiede
Specifications Benchmarks (tests) Testimonials

Unterschiede

Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Einen Fehler melden

Höhere Taktfrequenz

Rund um 53% höhere taktfrequenz

2.9 GHz 1.9 GHz
Größere Anzahl von Kernen

14 more cores

16 2
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

Rund um 69% higher specified turbo frequency

5.4 GHz 3.2 GHz

Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

Einen Fehler melden

Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

15 W 45 W

Specifications

Technische Daten

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Hintergrundinformationen zu den verglichenen Prozessoren, Serien, Generationen und Marktsegmenten.

Serie

Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Ryzen
Segment

Mobile Mobile
Form Factor

- Laptops / Desktops
Series

- Ryzen 3000 Series

Technische Daten der CPU

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

CPU Kerne

16 2
CPU Threads

16 2
E-core Base Clock

2.7 GHz -
Efficient Cores

8 -
Low Power Efficient-cores

2 -
Max. Boost Clock

5.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
P-core Base Clock

2.9 GHz -
Performance Cores

6 -
Base Frequency

- 1.9 GHz
Übertaktung

- Nein

IGPU

Interne Grafik beeinträchtigt nicht die Leistung der CPU, sondern übernimmt die Arbeit der Grafikkarte bei deren Abwesenheit oder auf mobilen Geräten.

GPU-Name

Intel Arc 140T GPU Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
GPU Turbo

2350 MHz -
GPU Frequency

- 1200 MHz
Graphics Cores

- 8

Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Typen, Kanalmenge des RAM, unterstützt von AMD Ryzen 3 3100U und Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. Je nach Motherboard können höhere oder niedrigere Speicherfrequenzen unterstützt werden.

Max. Speicher

128 GB -
Speicherkanäle

2 2
Speicher Typ

Up to LPDDR5/X 8400 MT/s -
PCIe

- PCIe 3.0
System Memory Specification

- 2400

Energieverbrauch

Vergleichen Sie die TDP-Anforderungen von TDP Intel Core Ultra 9 285H und AMD Ryzen 3 3100U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Turbo Power

115 W -
Minimum Assured Power

35 W -
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

45 W -
Configurable TDP

- 12-35 W
Default TDP

- 15 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

- 105 °C

Technologien und Erweiterungen

Architektur, Schnittstellen, zusätzliche Anweisungen, die von Intel Core Ultra 9 285H und AMD Ryzen 3 3100U, Technologien für virtuelle Maschinen und Verfahrenstechnik.

L3-Cache

24 MB 4 MB
Official specification sheet

https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf -
Datum der Veröffentlichung

Q1/2025 Q2/2026
Steckdose

FCBGA2049 FP5
Codename

- Picasso
L2-Cache

- 1 MB
technisches verfahren

- 12nm

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 224.78899 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 256.92631 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 225.546663 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 266.513428 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 269.637972 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3937 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	489 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1142 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	126 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6410.87284 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 155.985 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	20681 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2105 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8068 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	809 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.