Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 3 3100U — Specifications, performance, tests

Differences
Specifications Benchmarks Testimonials

Differences

Reasons to consider
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Report a bug

Higher clock speed

Around 53% better clock speed

2.9 GHz 1.9 GHz
More number of cores

14 more cores

16 2
Higher turbo clock speed

Around 69% higher specified turbo frequency

5.4 GHz 3.2 GHz

Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

Report a bug

Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

15 W 45 W

Specifications

Technical data

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

Family

Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Ryzen
Segment

Mobile Mobile
Form Factor

- Laptops / Desktops
Series

- Ryzen 3000 Series

CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

CPU Cores

16 2
CPU Threads

16 2
E-core Base Clock

2.7 GHz -
Efficient Cores

8 -
Low Power Efficient-cores

2 -
Max. Boost Clock

5.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
P-core Base Clock

2.9 GHz -
Performance Cores

6 -
Base Frequency

- 1.9 GHz
Overclocking

- No

IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

GPU name

Intel Arc 140T GPU Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
GPU Turbo

2350 MHz -
GPU Frequency

- 1200 MHz
Graphics Cores

- 8

Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 3 3100U and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

Max. Memory

128 GB -
Memory channels

2 2
Memory type

Up to LPDDR5/X 8400 MT/s -
PCIe

- PCIe 3.0
System Memory Specification

- 2400

Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and AMD Ryzen 3 3100U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Turbo Power

115 W -
Minimum Assured Power

35 W -
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

45 W -
Configurable TDP

- 12-35 W
Default TDP

- 15 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

- 105 °C

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and AMD Ryzen 3 3100U, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

L3-Cache

24 MB 4 MB
Official specification sheet

https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf -
Release date

Q1/2025 Q2/2026
Socket

FCBGA2049 FP5
Codename

- Picasso
L2-Cache

- 1 MB
Technology

- 12nm

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 224.78899 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 256.92631 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 225.546663 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 266.513428 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 269.637972 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3937 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	489 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1142 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	126 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6410.87284 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 155.985 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	20681 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2105 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8068 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	809 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.