Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 3 3100U — Especificações, desempenho, testes

Diferenças
Especificações Benchmarks Testemunhos

Diferenças

Razões a considerar
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Relatar um erro

Maior velocidade do relógio

Por volta de 53% melhor velocidade do relógio

2.9 GHz 1.9 GHz
Mais número de núcleos

14 more cores

16 2
Maior velocidade do relógio turbo

Por volta de 69% higher specified turbo frequency

5.4 GHz 3.2 GHz

Razões a considerar
AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

Relatar um erro

Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

15 W 45 W

Especificações

Dados técnicos

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

Família e grupo de CPU

Informação de base sobre os processadores a serem comparados, séries, geração e segmento de mercado.

Série

Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Ryzen
Segmento

Mobile Mobile
Form Factor

- Laptops / Desktops
Series

- Ryzen 3000 Series

Especificações técnicas da CPU

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Núcleos de CPU

16 2
Roscas de CPU

16 2
E-core Base Clock

2.7 GHz -
Efficient Cores

8 -
Low Power Efficient-cores

2 -
Max. Boost Clock

5.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
P-core Base Clock

2.9 GHz -
Performance Cores

6 -
Base Frequency

- 1.9 GHz
Overclocking

- Não

IGPU

A placa gráfica interna não afecta o desempenho da CPU, realiza o trabalho da placa gráfica na sua ausência ou em dispositivos móveis.

Nome da GPU

Intel Arc 140T GPU Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
GPU Turbo

2350 MHz -
GPU Frequency

- 1200 MHz
Graphics Cores

- 8

Especificações de memória & PCI

Tipos, quantidade de canais de RAM suportados por AMD Ryzen 3 3100U e Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. Dependendo das placas-mãe, podem ser suportadas frequências de memória mais altas ou mais baixas.

Máx. Memória

128 GB -
Canais de memória

2 2
Tipo de memória

Up to LPDDR5/X 8400 MT/s -
PCIe

- PCIe 3.0
System Memory Specification

- 2400

Consumo de energia

Comparar os requisitos de TDP do TDP Intel Core Ultra 9 285H e AMD Ryzen 3 3100U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Turbo Power

115 W -
Minimum Assured Power

35 W -
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

45 W -
Configurable TDP

- 12-35 W
Default TDP

- 15 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

- 105 °C

Tecnologias e extensões

Arquitectura, interfaces, instruções adicionais suportadas por Intel Core Ultra 9 285H e AMD Ryzen 3 3100U, tecnologias de máquinas virtuais e tecnologia de processos.

Кеш L3

24 MB 4 MB
Official specification sheet

https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf -
Data de lançamento

Q1/2025 Q2/2026
Socket

FCBGA2049 FP5
Codename

- Picasso
Кеш L2

- 1 MB
Processo técnico

- 12nm

Benchmarks

Testes de desempenho CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 224.78899 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 256.92631 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 225.546663 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 266.513428 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 269.637972 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3937 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	489 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1142 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	126 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6410.87284 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 155.985 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	20681 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2105 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8068 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	809 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.