Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 3 3100U — Spécifications, performances, tests

Differences
Spécifications Benchmarks Témoignages

Differences

Raisons de considérer
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Signaler un bogue

Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

Autour de 53% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

2.9 GHz 1.9 GHz
Plus grand nombre de cœurs

14 more cores

16 2
Vitesse d'horloge turbo plus élevée

Autour de 69% higher specified turbo frequency

5.4 GHz 3.2 GHz

Raisons de considérer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

Signaler un bogue

Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

15 W 45 W

Spécifications

Données techniques

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

CPU famille et groupe

Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.

Série

Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Ryzen
Segment

Mobile Mobile
Form Factor

- Laptops / Desktops
Series

- Ryzen 3000 Series

Caractéristiques techniques du CPU

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Cœurs de CPU

16 2
Fils de processeur

16 2
E-core Base Clock

2.7 GHz -
Efficient Cores

8 -
Low Power Efficient-cores

2 -
Max. Boost Clock

5.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
P-core Base Clock

2.9 GHz -
Performance Cores

6 -
Base Frequency

- 1.9 GHz
Overclocking

- Non

IGPU

Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.

Nom du GPU

Intel Arc 140T GPU Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
GPU Turbo

2350 MHz -
GPU Frequency

- 1200 MHz
Graphics Cores

- 8

Spécifications de la mémoire et PCI

Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par AMD Ryzen 3 3100U et Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.

Max. Mémoire

128 GB -
Canaux de mémoire

2 2
Type de mémoire

Up to LPDDR5/X 8400 MT/s -
PCIe

- PCIe 3.0
System Memory Specification

- 2400

Consommation d'énergie

Comparez les exigences du TDP Intel Core Ultra 9 285H et AMD Ryzen 3 3100U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Turbo Power

115 W -
Minimum Assured Power

35 W -
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

45 W -
Configurable TDP

- 12-35 W
Default TDP

- 15 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

- 105 °C

Technologies et extensions

Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par Intel Core Ultra 9 285H et AMD Ryzen 3 3100U, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.

L3-Cache

24 MB 4 MB
Official specification sheet

https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf -
Date de sortie

Q1/2025 Q2/2026
Socket

FCBGA2049 FP5
Codename

- Picasso
L2-Cache

- 1 MB
Processus technologique

- 12nm

Benchmarks

Tests de performance CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 224.78899 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 256.92631 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 225.546663 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 266.513428 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 269.637972 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 3 3100U

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3937 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	489 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1142 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	126 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6410.87284 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 155.985 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	20681 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2105 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8068 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	809 points	System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.