Abbildung der Produktfamilie.
Was ist die beste Wahl? Intel Core i7-14700K oder Intel Core i9-14900K? Welcher Prozessor ist schneller?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-14700K has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz. 20 / 28 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Freigegeben in Q4/2023.
Intel Core i9-14900K has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Freigegeben in Q4/2023.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 6% höhere taktfrequenz
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Größere Anzahl von Kernen
4 more cores
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 7 % higher specified turbo frequency
Intel Core i7-14700K
Hintergrundinformationen zu den verglichenen Prozessoren, Serien, Generationen und Marktsegmenten.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Interne Grafik beeinträchtigt nicht die Leistung der CPU, sondern übernimmt die Arbeit der Grafikkarte bei deren Abwesenheit oder auf mobilen Geräten.
Typen, Kanalmenge des RAM, unterstützt von Intel Core i9-14900K und Intel Core i7-14700K. Je nach Motherboard können höhere oder niedrigere Speicherfrequenzen unterstützt werden.
Vergleichen Sie die TDP-Anforderungen von TDP Intel Core i7-14700K und Intel Core i9-14900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektur, Schnittstellen, zusätzliche Anweisungen, die von Intel Core i7-14700K und Intel Core i9-14900K, Technologien für virtuelle Maschinen und Verfahrenstechnik.
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-14700K | Intel Core i9-14900K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 449.100305 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 525.297243 samples/min Submissions: 72 | +17.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 423.724736 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 537.152247 samples/min Submissions: 49 | +26.8 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 462.366159 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 531.350353 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +14.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 525.873311 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 605.963514 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +15.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 437.37477 samples/min Submissions: 84 | 503.755498 samples/min Submissions: 249 | +15.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 421.680169 samples/min Submissions: 66 | 511.944699 samples/min Submissions: 327 | +21.4 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 576.536543 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 576.147027 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -0.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 427.678184 samples/min Submissions: 82 | 497.466289 samples/min Submissions: 424 | +16.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 526.657449 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 606.198279 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +15.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 428.576395 samples/min Submissions: 139 | 477.890865 samples/min Submissions: 236 | +11.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 586.617037 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 591.518197 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +0.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 446.416798 samples/min Submissions: 84 | 497.628493 samples/min Submissions: 121 | +11.5 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-14700K | Intel Core i9-14900K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 547.651336 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 644.424795 samples/min Submissions: 31 | +17.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 457.887531 samples/min Submissions: 188 | 519.675217 samples/min Submissions: 305 | +13.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench 2024 / multi-core | 1982 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench 2024 / single-core | 127.9 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 5459 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 314 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 13672 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 832 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 35892 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2153 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-14700K | 12603.458641 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 28 threads / windows System RAM: 96 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06) Duration: 793.433 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 10033.109261 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 99.67 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |