产品系列示意图。
产品系列示意图。
什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i7-14700K 或 Intel Core i9-14900K? 哪种处理器更快？
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-14700K has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz. 20 / 28 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2023.
Intel Core i9-14900K has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2023.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 6% 更好的时钟速度
3.20 GHz
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
4 more cores
20
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 7 % higher specified turbo frequency
5.60 GHz
Intel Core i7-14700K
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i (14th Gen)
Desktop
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
3.2 GHz
24
32
2.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
16
3.2 GHz
5.6 GHz
8
6 GHz
6 GHz
5.8 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
32
300 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics 770
1650 MHz
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i9-14900K 和 Intel Core i7-14700K. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
192 GB
2
DDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-14700K 和 Intel Core i9-14900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
125 W
253 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-14700K 和 Intel Core i9-14900K, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Raptor Lake
36 MB
32 MB
36 MB
Q4/2023
FCLGA1700
Intel 7
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-14700K | Intel Core i9-14900K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 449.100305 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 525.297243 samples/min Submissions: 72 | +17.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 423.724736 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 537.152247 samples/min Submissions: 49 | +26.8 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 462.366159 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 531.350353 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +14.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 525.873311 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 605.963514 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +15.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 437.37477 samples/min Submissions: 84 | 503.755498 samples/min Submissions: 249 | +15.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 421.680169 samples/min Submissions: 66 | 511.944699 samples/min Submissions: 327 | +21.4 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 576.536543 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 576.147027 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -0.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 427.678184 samples/min Submissions: 82 | 497.466289 samples/min Submissions: 424 | +16.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 526.657449 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 606.198279 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +15.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 428.576395 samples/min Submissions: 139 | 477.890865 samples/min Submissions: 236 | +11.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 586.617037 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 591.518197 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +0.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 446.416798 samples/min Submissions: 84 | 497.628493 samples/min Submissions: 121 | +11.5 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-14700K | Intel Core i9-14900K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 547.651336 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 644.424795 samples/min Submissions: 31 | +17.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 457.887531 samples/min Submissions: 188 | 519.675217 samples/min Submissions: 305 | +13.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench 2024 / multi-core | 1982 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench 2024 / single-core | 127.9 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 5459 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 314 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 13672 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 832 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 35892 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2153 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 4090 System RAM: 16 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-14700K | 12603.458641 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 28 threads / windows System RAM: 96 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06) Duration: 793.433 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 10033.109261 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 99.67 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
