什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-12400F 或 Intel Core i7-12700F? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
Intel Core i7-12700F has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz. 12 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
更高的时钟速度
左右 19% 更好的时钟速度
2.10 GHz
共同立场 Intel Core i5-12400F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
更多的核心数量
6 more cores
6
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 11 % higher specified turbo frequency
4.40 GHz
共同立场 Intel Core i7-12700F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i5-12400F
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i7
12
Intel Core i7-11700F
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Golden Cove
4x Gracemont
2.1 GHz
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
12
20
是
没有
4.9 GHz
-
4 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
None
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-12700F 和 Intel Core i5-12400F. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
没有
128 GB
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
5.0 x 20
是
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-12400F 和 Intel Core i7-12700F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
65 W
180 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-12400F 和 Intel Core i7-12700F, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Alder Lake S
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
12 MB
25 MB
Q1/2022
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Shared tests with results for both models: 8
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400F | Intel Core i7-12700F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 166.939907 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 248.629718 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +48.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 290.591962 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +71.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | 228.87724 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +48.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 249.656014 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +70.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | 234.358451 samples/min Submissions: 14 | +60.8 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 213.615042 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +43.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 274.511737 samples/min Submissions: 10 | +73.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 253.915537 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +60.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700F | 7964.890762 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M-C Duration: 125.551 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i5-12400F 和 Intel Core i7-12700F.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
